Joint analysis of convective structure from the APR-2 precipitation radar and the DAWN Doppler wind lidar during the 2017 Convective Processes Experiment (CPEX)
-
Published:2020-08-21
Issue:8
Volume:13
Page:4521-4537
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Turk F. JosephORCID, Hristova-Veleva SvetlaORCID, Durden Stephen L.ORCID, Tanelli Simone, Sy Ousmane, Emmitt G. David, Greco Steve, Zhang Sara Q.
Abstract
Abstract. The mechanisms linking convection and cloud dynamical
processes are major factors in much of the uncertainty in both weather and
climate prediction. Further constraining the uncertainty in convective cloud
processes linking 3-D air motion and cloud structure through models and
observations is vital for improvements in weather forecasting and
understanding limits on atmospheric predictability. To date, there have been
relatively few airborne observations specifically targeted for linking the
3-D air motion surrounding developing clouds to the subsequent development
(or nondevelopment) of convective precipitation. During the May–June 2017
Convective Processes Experiment (CPEX), NASA DC-8-based airborne
observations were collected from the JPL Ku- and Ka-band Airborne Precipitation
Radar (APR-2) and the 2 µm Doppler Aerosol Wind (DAWN) lidar during
approximately 100 h of flight. For CPEX, the APR-2 provided the vertical air
motion and structure of the cloud systems in nearby precipitating regions
where DAWN is unable to sense. Conversely, DAWN sampled vertical wind
profiles in aerosol-rich regions surrounding the convection but is unable
to sense the wind field structure within most clouds. In this paper,
the complementary nature of these data are presented from the 10–11 June
flight dates, including the APR-2 precipitation structure and Doppler wind
fields as well as adjacent wind profiles from the DAWN data.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference26 articles.
1. Baker, W. E., Atlas, R., Cardinali, C., Clement, A., Emmitt, G. D., Gentry,
B. M., Hardesty, R. M., Källén, E., Kavaya, M. J., Langland, R., Ma,
Z., Masutani, M., McCarty, W., Pierce, R. B., Pu, Z., Riishojgaard, L. P.,
Ryan, J., Tucker, S., Weissmann, M., and Yoe, J. G.: Lidar-Measured Wind
Profiles: The Missing Link in the Global Observing System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 543–564, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00164.1, 2014. 2. Black, M. L., Burpee, R. W., and Marks, F. D.: Vertical Motion
Characteristics of Tropical Cyclones Determined with Airborne Doppler Radial
Velocities, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1887–1909, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<1887:VMCOTC>2.0.CO;2, 1996. 3. Black, P., Harrison, L., Beaubien, M., Bluth, R., Woods, R., Penny, A.,
Smith, R. W., and Doyle, J. D.: High-Definition Sounding System (HDSS) for
Atmospheric Profiling, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 34, 777–796, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00210.1, 2017. 4. Bucci, L. R., O'Handley, C., Emmitt, G. D., Zhang, J. A., Ryan, K., and
Atlas, R.: Validation of an Airborne Doppler Wind Lidar in Tropical
Cyclones, Sensors (Basel), 18, 4288, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124288, 2018. 5. Chen, S. S., Kerns, B. W., Guy, N., Jorgensen, D. P., Delanoë, J., Viltard,
N., Zappa, C. J., Judt, F., Lee, C.-Y., and Savarin, A.: Aircraft
Observations of Dry Air, the ITCZ, Convective Cloud Systems, and Cold Pools
in MJO during DYNAMO, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 405–423,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00196.1, 2015.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|