Mid-Pliocene Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation simulated in PlioMIP2
-
Published:2021-02-25
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:529-543
-
ISSN:1814-9332
-
Container-title:Climate of the Past
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Clim. Past
Author:
Zhang ZhongshiORCID, Li XiangyuORCID, Guo ChunchengORCID, Otterå Odd Helge, Nisancioglu Kerim H.ORCID, Tan Ning, Contoux CamilleORCID, Ramstein Gilles, Feng Ran, Otto-Bliesner Bette L.ORCID, Brady EstherORCID, Chandan DeepakORCID, Peltier W. RichardORCID, Baatsen Michiel L. J., von der Heydt Anna S.ORCID, Weiffenbach Julia E., Stepanek ChristianORCID, Lohmann GerritORCID, Zhang QiongORCID, Li QiangORCID, Chandler Mark A.ORCID, Sohl Linda E.ORCID, Haywood Alan M., Hunter Stephen J.ORCID, Tindall Julia C., Williams CharlesORCID, Lunt Daniel J.ORCID, Chan Wing-Le, Abe-Ouchi AyakoORCID
Abstract
Abstract. In the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2 (PlioMIP2), coupled climate models have been used to simulate an interglacial climate during
the mid-Piacenzian warm period (mPWP; 3.264 to 3.025 Ma). Here, we compare the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), poleward
ocean heat transport and sea surface warming in the Atlantic simulated with these models. In PlioMIP2, all models simulate an intensified
mid-Pliocene AMOC. However, there is no consistent response in the simulated Atlantic ocean heat transport nor in the depth of the Atlantic overturning
cell. The models show a large spread in the simulated AMOC maximum, the Atlantic ocean heat transport and the surface warming in the North
Atlantic. Although a few models simulate a surface warming of ∼ 8–12 ∘C in the North Atlantic, similar to the reconstruction
from Pliocene Research, Interpretation and Synoptic Mapping (PRISM) version 4, most models appear to underestimate this warming. The large
model spread and model–data discrepancies in the PlioMIP2 ensemble do not support the hypothesis that an intensification of the AMOC, together
with an increase in northward ocean heat transport, is the dominant mechanism for the mid-Pliocene warm climate over the North Atlantic.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China China Scholarship Council China Postdoctoral Science Foundation NordForsk
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Paleontology,Stratigraphy,Global and Planetary Change
Reference57 articles.
1. Badger, M. P. S., Schmidt, D. N., Mackensen, A., and Pancost, R. D.:
High-resolution alkenone palaeobarometry indicates relatively stable pCO2 during the pliocene (3.3–2.8 ma),
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 371, 20130094, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0094, 2013. 2. Bragg, F. J., Lunt, D. J., and Haywood, A. M.: Mid-Pliocene climate modelled using the UK Hadley Centre Model: PlioMIP Experiments 1 and 2, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1109–1125, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1109-2012, 2012. 3. Brierley, C. M. and Fedorov, A. V.: Comparing the impacts of Miocene–Pliocene changes in inter-ocean gateways on climate: Central American Seaway, Bering Strait, and Indonesia, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 444, 116–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.03.010, 2016. 4. Burke, K. D., Williams, J. W., Chandler, M. A., Haywood, A. M., Lunt, D. J., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.:
Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 13288–13293, 2018. 5. Burls, N. J., Fedorov, A. V., Sigman, D. M., Jaccard, S. L., Tiedemann, R., and Haug G. H.: Active Pacific meridional overturning circulation (PMOC) during the warm Pliocene, Science Advances, 3, e1700156, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700156, 2017.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|