What can we learn from European continuous atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> measurements to quantify regional fluxes – Part 2: Sensitivity of flux accuracy to inverse setup
-
Published:2010-03-31
Issue:6
Volume:10
Page:3119-3129
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Carouge C.,Rayner P. J.,Peylin P.,Bousquet P.,Chevallier F.,Ciais P.
Abstract
Abstract. An inverse model using atmospheric CO2 observations from a European network of stations to reconstruct daily CO2 fluxes and their uncertainties over Europe at 50 km resolution has been developed within a Bayesian framework. We use the pseudo-data approach in which we try to recover known fluxes using a range of perturbations to the input. In this study, the focus is put on the sensitivity of flux accuracy to the inverse setup, varying the prior flux errors, the pseudo-data errors and the network of stations. We show that, under a range of assumptions about prior error and data error we can recover fluxes reliably at the scale of 1000 km and 10 days. At smaller scales the performance is highly sensitive to details of the inverse set-up. The use of temporal correlations in the flux domain appears to be of the same importance as the spatial correlations. We also note that the use of simple, isotropic correlations on the prior flux errors is more reliable than the use of apparently physically-based errors. Finally, increasing the European atmospheric network density improves the area with significant error reduction in the flux retrieval.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference24 articles.
1. Carouge, C., Bousquet, P., Peylin, P., Rayner, P. J., and Ciais, P.: What can we learn from European continuous atmospheric CO2 measurements to quantify regional fluxes – Part~1: Potential of the 2001 network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3119–3129, 2010. 2. Chevallier, F., Viovy, N., Reichstein, M., and Ciais, P.: On the assignment of prior errors in Bayesian inversions of CO2 surface fluxes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(13), L13802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026496, 2006. 3. Engelen, R. J. and McNally, A. P.: Estimating atmospheric CO2 from advanced infrared satellite radiances within an operational four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data assimilation system: Results and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110(D18), D18305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005982, 2005. 4. Enting, I. G.: An empirical characterisation of signal versus noise in CO2 data, Tellus B, 54(4), 301–306, 2002. 5. Geels, C., Gloor, M., Ciais, P., Bousquet, P., Peylin, P., Vermeulen, A. T., Dargaville, R., Aalto, T., Brandt, J., Christensen, J. H., Frohn, L. M., Haszpra, L., Karstens, U., Rödenbeck, C., Ramonet, M., Carboni, G., and Santaguida, R.: Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe – Part 1: mapping the atmospheric CO2 signals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3461–3479, 2007.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|