Sensitivity analysis of runoff modeling to statistical downscaling models in the western Mediterranean
-
Published:2016-03-08
Issue:3
Volume:20
Page:1031-1047
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Grouillet Benjamin, Ruelland DenisORCID, Vaittinada Ayar Pradeebane, Vrac Mathieu
Abstract
Abstract. This paper analyzes the sensitivity of a hydrological model to different methods to statistically downscale climate precipitation and temperature over four western Mediterranean basins illustrative of different hydro-meteorological situations. The comparison was conducted over a common 20-year period (1986&ndsh;2005) to capture different climatic conditions in the basins. The daily GR4j conceptual model was used to simulate streamflow that was eventually evaluated at a 10-day time step. Cross-validation showed that this model is able to correctly reproduce runoff in both dry and wet years when high-resolution observed climate forcings are used as inputs. These simulations can thus be used as a benchmark to test the ability of different statistically downscaled data sets to reproduce various aspects of the hydrograph. Three different statistical downscaling models were tested: an analog method (ANALOG), a stochastic weather generator (SWG) and the cumulative distribution function–transform approach (CDFt). We used the models to downscale precipitation and temperature data from NCEP/NCAR reanalyses as well as outputs from two general circulation models (GCMs) (CNRM-CM5 and IPSL-CM5A-MR) over the reference period. We then analyzed the sensitivity of the hydrological model to the various downscaled data via five hydrological indicators representing the main features of the hydrograph. Our results confirm that using high-resolution downscaled climate values leads to a major improvement in runoff simulations in comparison to the use of low-resolution raw inputs from reanalyses or climate models. The results also demonstrate that the ANALOG and CDFt methods generally perform much better than SWG in reproducing mean seasonal streamflow, interannual runoff volumes as well as low/high flow distribution. More generally, our approach provides a guideline to help choose the appropriate statistical downscaling models to be used in climate change impact studies to minimize the range of uncertainty associated with such downscaling methods.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Arnell, N. W.: Uncertainty in the relationship between climate forcing and
hydrological response in UK catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15,
897–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-897-2011, 2011. 2. Barnston, A. G. and Livezey, R. E.: Classification, seasonality and
persistence
of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns, Mon. Weather Rev.,
115, 1083–1126, 1987. 3. Benke, K. K., Lowell, K. E., and Hamilton, A. J.: Parameter uncertainty,
sensitivity analysis and prediction error in a water-balance hydrological
model, Math. Comp. Model., 47, 1134–1149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.05.017, 2008. 4. Brigode, P., Oudin, L., and Perrin, C.: Hydrological model parameter instability:
A source of additional uncertainty in estimating the hydrological impacts
of climate change?, J. Hydrol., 476, 410–425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.012, 2013. 5. Buishand, T. A., Shabalova, M. V., and Brandsma, T.: On the choice of the
temporal aggregation level for statistical downscaling of precipitation, J.
Clim., 17, 1816–1827, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1816:OTCOTT>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|