Sensitivity analysis of the meteorological preprocessor MPP-FMI 3.0 using algorithmic differentiation
-
Published:2017-10-17
Issue:10
Volume:10
Page:3793-3803
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Backman JohnORCID, Wood Curtis R., Auvinen MikkoORCID, Kangas Leena, Hannuniemi Hanna, Karppinen AriORCID, Kukkonen Jaakko
Abstract
Abstract. The meteorological input parameters for urban- and local-scale dispersion models can be evaluated by preprocessing meteorological observations, using a boundary-layer parameterisation model. This study presents a sensitivity analysis of a meteorological preprocessor model (MPP-FMI) that utilises readily available meteorological data as input. The sensitivity of the preprocessor to meteorological input was analysed using algorithmic differentiation (AD). The AD tool used was TAPENADE. The AD method numerically evaluates the partial derivatives of functions that are implemented in a computer program. In this study, we focus on the evaluation of vertical fluxes in the atmosphere and in particular on the sensitivity of the predicted inverse Obukhov length and friction velocity on the model input parameters. The study shows that the estimated inverse Obukhov length and friction velocity are most sensitive to wind speed and second most sensitive to solar irradiation. The dependency on wind speed is most pronounced at low wind speeds. The presented results have implications for improving the meteorological preprocessing models. AD is shown to be an efficient tool for studying the ranges of sensitivities of the predicted parameters on the model input values quantitatively. A wider use of such advanced sensitivity analysis methods could potentially be very useful in analysing and improving the models used in atmospheric sciences.
Funder
Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference15 articles.
1. Fisher, B., Kukkonen, J., and Schatzmann, M.: Meteorology applied to urban air pollution problems COST 715, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 16, 560–570, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2001.000650, 2001. 2. Griewank, A. and Walther, A.: Evaluating Derivatives Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, vol. 2, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA, 1–56, 2008. 3. Guerrette, J. J. and Henze, D. K.: Development and application of the WRFPLUS-Chem online chemistry adjoint and WRFDA-Chem assimilation system, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1857–1876, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1857-2015, 2015. 4. Hascoet, L. and Pascual, V.: The Tapenade Automatic Differentiation Tool: principles, model, and specification, ACM T. Math. Software, 39, 20:1–20:43, https://doi.org/10.1145/2450153.2450158, 2013. 5. Karppinen, A., Joffre, S. M., and Vaajama, P.: Boundary-layer parameterization for Finnish regulatory dispersion models, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 8, 3–6, 1997.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|