Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study
-
Published:2024-06-26
Issue:12
Volume:17
Page:3809-3827
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Diez SebastianORCID, Lacy StuartORCID, Coe HughORCID, Urquiza Josefina, Priestman Max, Flynn Michael, Marsden NicholasORCID, Martin Nicholas A., Gillott Stefan, Bannan ThomasORCID, Edwards Pete M.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. In times of growing concern about the impacts of air pollution across the globe, lower-cost sensor technology is giving the first steps in helping to enhance our understanding and ability to manage air quality issues, particularly in regions without established monitoring networks. While the benefits of greater spatial coverage and real-time measurements that these systems offer are evident, challenges still need to be addressed regarding sensor reliability and data quality. Given the limitations imposed by intellectual property, commercial implementations are often “black boxes”, which represents an extra challenge as it limits end users' understanding of the data production process. In this paper we present an overview of the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study, a comprehensive 3-year assessment across a range of urban environments in the United Kingdom, evaluating 43 sensor devices, including 119 gas sensors and 118 particulate matter (PM) sensors, from multiple companies. QUANT stands out as one of the most comprehensive studies of commercial air quality sensor systems carried out to date, encompassing a wide variety of companies in a single evaluation and including two generations of sensor technologies. Integrated into an extensive dataset open to the public, it was designed to provide a long-term evaluation of the precision, accuracy and stability of commercially available sensor systems. To attain a nuanced understanding of sensor performance, we have complemented commonly used single-value metrics (e.g. coefficient of determination, R2; root mean square error, RMSE; mean absolute error, MAE) with visual tools. These include regression plots, relative expanded uncertainty (REU) plots and target plots, enhancing our analysis beyond traditional metrics. This overview discusses the assessment methodology and key findings showcasing the significance of the study. While more comprehensive analyses are reserved for future detailed publications, the results shown here highlight the significant variation between systems, the incidence of corrections made by manufacturers, the effects of relocation to different environments and the long-term behaviour of the systems. Additionally, the importance of accounting for uncertainties associated with reference instruments in sensor evaluations is emphasised. Practical considerations in the application of these sensors in real-world scenarios are also discussed, and potential solutions to end-user data challenges are presented. Offering key information about the sensor systems' capabilities, the QUANT study will serve as a valuable resource for those seeking to implement commercial solutions as complementary tools to tackle air pollution.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference77 articles.
1. Adams, R. P. and MacKay, D. J. C.: Bayesian Online Changepoint Detection, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0710.3742, 19 October 2007. 2. Alam, M. S., Crilley, L. R., Lee, J. D., Kramer, L. J., Pfrang, C., Vázquez-Moreno, M., Ródenas, M., Muñoz, A., and Bloss, W. J.: Interference from alkenes in chemiluminescent NOx measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5977–5991, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5977-2020, 2020. 3. Allan, J., Harrison, R., and Maggs, R.: Defra Report: Measurement Uncertainty for PM2.5 in the Context of the UK National Network, https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/library/reports?report_id=1074 (last access: 19 June 2024), 2022. 4. Aminikhanghahi, S. and Cook, D. J.: A survey of methods for time series change point detection, Knowl. Inf. Syst., 51, 339–367, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-016-0987-z, 2017. 5. Aula, K., Lagerspetz, E., Nurmi, P., and Tarkoma, S.: Evaluation of Low-cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models, ACM Trans. Sens. Netw., 18, 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1145/3512889, 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|