Evaluation of Low-cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models

Abstract

We contribute a novel model evaluation technique that divides available measurements into training and testing sets in a way that adheres to the requirements imposed on professional monitoring stations. We perform extensive and systematic experiments with a wide range of state-of-the-art calibration models to demonstrate that our approach provides accurate insights about the performance of calibration models in real-world deployments, while at the same time highlighting issues with evaluation techniques used in previous works. Among others, our results show that although trained and tested in the same location, calibration errors can exhibit deviation up to 116% depending on the evaluation protocol that is being adopted. We also demonstrate that models trained with continuous data can suffer up to 76% greater error when tested with data coming from diverse environmental conditions. In contrast, when models are trained and tested with our method, the variability of errors is significantly reduced and the robustness of calibration models is significantly improved. The overall performance improvements depend on pollutant concentration, ranging from 10% for low concentrations to 90% for high concentrations that represent conditions that are most dangerous for human health.