Author:
Tang Yingying,Harpenslager Sarah F.,van Kempen Monique M. L.,Verbaarschot Evi J. H.,Loeffen Laury M. J. M.,Roelofs Jan G. M.,Smolders Alfons J. P.,Lamers Leon P. M.
Abstract
Abstract. The sequestration of nutrients from surface waters by aquatic macrophytes and sediments provides an important service to both natural and constructed wetlands. While emergent species take up nutrients from the sediment, submerged and floating macrophytes filter nutrients directly from the surface water, which may be more efficient in constructed wetlands. It remains unclear, however, whether their efficiency is sufficient for wastewater purification and how plant species and nutrient loading affects nutrient distribution over plants, water and sediment. We therefore determined nutrient removal efficiencies of different vegetation (Azolla filiculoides, Ceratophyllum demersum and Myriophyllum spicatum) and sediment types (clay, peaty clay and peat) at three nutrient input rates, in a full factorial, outdoor mesocosm experiment. At low loading (0.43 mg P m−2 d−1), plant uptake was the main pathway (100 %) for phosphorus (P) removal, while sediments showed a net P release. A. filiculoides and M. spicatum showed the highest biomass production and could be harvested regularly for nutrient recycling, whereas C. demersum was outcompeted by spontaneously developing macrophytes and algae. Higher nutrient loading only stimulated A. filiculoides growth. At higher rates ( ≥ 21.4 mg P m−2 d−1), 50–90 % of added P ended up in sediments, with peat sediments becoming more easily saturated. For nitrogen (N), 45–90 % was either taken up by the sediment or lost to the atmosphere at loadings ≥ 62 mg N m−2 d−1. This shows that aquatic macrophytes can indeed function as an efficient nutrient filter but only for low loading rates (polishing) and not for high rates (purification). The outcome of this controlled study not only contributes to our understanding of nutrient dynamics in constructed wetlands but also shows the differential effects of wetland sediment types and plant species. Furthermore, the acquired knowledge may benefit the application of macrophyte harvesting to remove and recycle nutrients from both constructed wetlands and nutrient-loaded natural wetlands.
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference53 articles.
1. Barko, J. W. and Smart, R. M.: Mobilization of sediment phosphorus by submersed freshwater macrophytes, Freshwater Biol., 10, 229–238, 1980.
2. Best, M. D. and Mantai, K. E.: Growth of Myriophyllum: sediment or lake water as the source of nitrogen and phosphorus, Ecology, 59, 1075–1080, 1978.
3. Biswas, S. and Sarkar, S.: Azolla cultivation: a supplementary cattle feed production through natural resource management, Agric. Update, 8, 670–672, 2013.
4. Brix, H.: Functions of macrophytes in constructed wetlands, Water Sci. Technol., 29, 71–78, 1994.
5. Brix, H.: How “green” are aquaculture, constructed wetlands and conventional wastewater treatment systems?, Water Sci. Technol., 40, 45–50, 1999.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献