Characterizing sampling and quality screening biases in infrared and microwave limb sounding
-
Published:2018-03-27
Issue:6
Volume:18
Page:4187-4199
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Millán Luis F.,Livesey Nathaniel J.,Santee Michelle L.,von Clarmann Thomas
Abstract
Abstract. This study investigates orbital sampling biases and evaluates the additional
impact caused by data quality screening for the Michelson Interferometer for
Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) and the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder
(MLS). MIPAS acts as a proxy for typical infrared limb emission sounders,
while MLS acts as a proxy for microwave limb sounders. These biases were
calculated for temperature and several trace gases by interpolating model
fields to real sampling patterns and, additionally, screening those locations
as directed by their corresponding quality criteria. Both instruments have
dense uniform sampling patterns typical of limb emission sounders, producing
almost identical sampling biases. However, there is a substantial difference
between the number of locations discarded. MIPAS, as a mid-infrared
instrument, is very sensitive to clouds, and measurements affected by them
are thus rejected from the analysis. For example, in the tropics, the MIPAS
yield is strongly affected by clouds, while MLS is mostly unaffected. The results show that upper-tropospheric sampling biases in zonally averaged
data, for both instruments, can be up to 10 to 30 %, depending on the
species, and up to 3 K for temperature. For MIPAS, the sampling reduction
due to quality screening worsens the biases, leading to values as large as
30 to 100 % for the trace gases and expanding the 3 K bias region for
temperature. This type of sampling bias is largely induced by the geophysical
origins of the screening (e.g. clouds). Further, analysis of long-term time
series reveals that these additional quality screening biases may affect the
ability to accurately detect upper-tropospheric long-term changes using such
data. In contrast, MLS data quality screening removes
sufficiently few points that no additional bias is introduced, although its
penetration is limited to the upper troposphere, while MIPAS may cover well
into the mid-troposphere in cloud-free scenarios. We emphasize that the
results of this study refer only to the representativeness of the respective
data, not to their intrinsic quality.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Aghedo, A. M., Bowman, K. W., Shindell, D. T., and Faluvegi, G.: The impact
of orbital sampling, monthly averaging and vertical resolution on climate
chemistry model evaluation with satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 6493–6514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6493-2011, 2011. a 2. Bell, T. L. and Kundu, P. K.: A Study of the Sampling Error in Satellite
Rainfall Estimates Using Optimal Averaging of Data and a Stochastic Model,
J. Climate, 9, 1251–1268,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1251:asotse>2.0.co;2, 1996. a 3. Bernath, P. F., McElroy, C. T., Abrams, M. C., Boone, C. D., Butler, M.,
Camy-Peyret, C., Carleer, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Colin, R., DeCola,
P., DeMazière, M., Drummond, J. R., Dufour, D., Evans, W. F. J., Fast, H.,
Fussen, D., Gilbert, K., Jennings, D. E., Llewellyn, E. J., Lowe, R. P.,
Mahieu, E., McConnell, J. C., McHugh, M., McLeod, S. D., Michaud, R.,
Midwinter, C., Nassar, R., Nichitiu, F., Nowlan, C., Rinsland, C. P., Rochon,
Y. J., Rowlands, N., Semeniuk, K., Simon, P., Skelton, R., Sloan, J. J.,
Soucy, M.-A., Strong, K., Tremblay, P., Turnbull, D., Walker, K. A., Walkty,
I., Wardle, D. A., Wehrle, V., Zander, R., and Zou, J.: Atmospheric Chemistry
Experiment (ACE): Mission overview, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15S01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl022386, 2005. a 4. Bodeker, G. E., Hassler, B., Young, P. J., and Portmann, R. W.: A vertically
resolved, global, gap-free ozone database for assessing or constraining
global climate model simulations, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 31–43,
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-31-2013, 2013. a 5. Bosilovich, M., Akella, S., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Gelaro, R.,
Kovach, R., Liu, Q., Molod, A., Norris, P., Wargan, K., Chao, W., Reichle,
R., Takacs, L., Vikhliaev, Y., Bloom, S., Collow, A., Firth, S., Labow, G.,
Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Reale, O., Schubert, S. D., and Suarez, M.:
MERRA-2: Initial evaluation of the climate, NASA Tech. Rep Series on Global
Modeling and Data Assimilation, 43, 2015. a
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|