The SPARC Water Vapor Assessment II: assessment of satellite measurements of upper tropospheric humidity
-
Published:2022-06-09
Issue:11
Volume:15
Page:3377-3400
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Read William G., Stiller GabrieleORCID, Lossow StefanORCID, Kiefer Michael, Khosrawi FarahnazORCID, Hurst DaleORCID, Vömel HolgerORCID, Rosenlof KarenORCID, Dinelli Bianca M.ORCID, Raspollini PieraORCID, Nedoluha Gerald E., Gille John C., Kasai Yasuko, Eriksson PatrickORCID, Sioris Christopher E., Walker Kaley A.ORCID, Weigel KatjaORCID, Burrows John P.ORCID, Rozanov AlexeiORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Nineteen limb-viewing data sets (occultation, passive thermal, and UV scattering) and two nadir
upper tropospheric humidity (UTH) data sets are intercompared and also compared to frost-point hygrometer
balloon sondes. The upper troposphere considered here covers the pressure range from 300–100 hPa.
UTH is a challenging measurement, because concentrations
vary between 2–1000 ppmv (parts per million by volume), with sharp changes in vertical
gradients near the tropopause. Cloudiness in this region
also makes the measurement challenging. The atmospheric temperature is also highly
variable ranging from 180–250 K. The assessment of satellite-measured UTH
is based on coincident comparisons with balloon frost-point hygrometer
sondes, multi-month mapped comparisons, zonal mean time series comparisons, and
coincident satellite-to-satellite comparisons. While the satellite fields show
similar features in maps and time series, quantitatively they can differ by a
factor of 2 in concentration, with strong dependencies on the amount of UTH.
Additionally, time-lag response-corrected Vaisala RS92 radiosondes are
compared to satellites and the frost-point hygrometer measurements. In summary,
most satellite data sets reviewed here show on average ∼30 % agreement
amongst themselves and frost-point data but with an additional ∼30 %
variability about the mean bias. The Vaisala RS92 sonde, even with a time-lag
correction, shows poor behavior for pressures less than 200 hPa.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference48 articles.
1. AIRS Science Team and Teixeira, J.: AIRS/Aqua L3 Daily Standard Physical Retrieval (AIRS-only) 1 degree × 1 degree V006, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/AIRS3STD_006/summary (last access: October 2014), 2013. a 2. Anderson, J. G. M., Wilmouth, D., Smith, J. B., and Sayres, D. S.: UV dosage
levels in Summer: Increased risk of ozone loss from convectively injected
water vapor, Science, 337, 835–839, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222978, 2012. a 3. Aumann, H. H., Chahine, M. T., Gautier, C., Goldberg, M. D., Kalnay, E., McMillin,
L. M., Revercomb, H., Rosenkranz, P. W., Smith, W. L., and Staelin, D. H.:
AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua Mission: Design, Science Objectives, Data
Products, and Processing Systems, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote, 41, 253–264, 2003. a 4. Bernath, P. F.: The Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 186, 3–16, 2017. a 5. Bertaux, J. L., Kyröla, E., and Wehr, T.: Stellar Occultaion Technique
for Atmospheric Ozone Monitoring: GOMOS on ENVISAT, Earth Observation
Quarterly, 67, 17–20, 2000. a
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|