The SPARC water vapour assessment II: biases and drifts of water vapour satellite data records with respect to frost point hygrometer records
-
Published:2023-10-12
Issue:19
Volume:16
Page:4589-4642
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Kiefer Michael, Hurst Dale F.ORCID, Stiller Gabriele P.ORCID, Lossow StefanORCID, Vömel HolgerORCID, Anderson John, Azam Faiza, Bertaux Jean-LoupORCID, Blanot Laurent, Bramstedt KlausORCID, Burrows John P.ORCID, Damadeo RobertORCID, Dinelli Bianca MariaORCID, Eriksson PatrickORCID, García-Comas MayaORCID, Gille John C., Hervig Mark, Kasai Yasuko, Khosrawi FarahnazORCID, Murtagh DonalORCID, Nedoluha Gerald E., Noël StefanORCID, Raspollini PieraORCID, Read William G., Rosenlof Karen H.ORCID, Rozanov AlexeiORCID, Sioris Christopher E., Sugita TakafumiORCID, von Clarmann Thomas, Walker Kaley A.ORCID, Weigel KatjaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Satellite data records of stratospheric water vapour have been compared to
balloon-borne frost point hygrometer (FP) profiles that are coincident in space and
time. The satellite data records of 15 different instruments cover water vapour data available from
January 2000 through December 2016. The hygrometer data are from 27 stations
all over the world in the same period. For the comparison, real or constructed
averaging kernels have been applied to the
hygrometer profiles to adjust them to the measurement characteristics of
the satellite instruments. For bias evaluation, we have compared satellite
profiles averaged over the available temporal coverage to the means of coincident FP profiles for
individual stations. For drift determinations, we
analysed time series of relative differences between spatiotemporally coincident
satellite and hygrometer
profiles at individual stations. In a synopsis we have also calculated the mean
biases and drifts (and their respective uncertainties) for each satellite record
over all applicable hygrometer stations in three altitude ranges (10–30 hPa,
30–100 hPa, and 100 hPa to tropopause). Most of the satellite data have
biases <10 % and average drifts <1 % yr−1 in at least one of the respective
altitude ranges.
Virtually all biases are significant in the sense that their
uncertainty range in terms of twice the standard error of the mean does not include
zero. Statistically significant drifts (95 % confidence) are detected for 35 %
of the ≈ 1200 time series of relative differences between satellites and
hygrometers.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Barrett, E. W., Herndon Jr., L. R., and Carter, H. J.: Some Measurements of the
Distribution of Water Vapor in the Stratosphere1, Tellus, 2, 302–311,
https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v2i4.8602,
1950. a 2. Blunier, T., Chappellaz, J. A., Schwander, J., Barnola, J. M., Desperts, T.,
Stauffer, B., and Raynaud, D.: Atmospheric methane, record from a Greenland
Ice Core over the last 1000 year, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20,
2219–2222, https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL02414,
1993. a 3. Brewer, A. W.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of
helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 75, 351–363,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603,
1949. a 4. Brinkop, S., Dameris, M., Jöckel, P., Garny, H., Lossow, S., and Stiller, G.: The millennium water vapour drop in chemistry–climate model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8125–8140, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8125-2016, 2016. a 5. Dessler, A. E., Schoeberl, M. R., Wang, T., Davis, S., and Rosenlof, K. H.:
Stratospheric water vapor feedback, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
18087–18091, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310344110, 2013. a
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|