On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
-
Published:2020-07-06
Issue:13
Volume:20
Page:7829-7842
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Flynn Clare Marie,Mauritsen Thorsten
Abstract
Abstract. The Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) to a doubling of atmospheric CO2, along with the transient climate response (TCR) and
greenhouse gas emissions pathways, determines the amount of future warming. Coupled climate models have in the past been important tools to estimate
and understand ECS. ECS estimated from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models lies between 2.0 and 4.7 K (mean of
3.2 K), whereas in the latest CMIP6 the spread has increased to 1.8–5.5 K (mean of 3.7 K), with 5 out of 25 models exceeding
5 K. It is thus pertinent to understand the causes underlying this shift. Here we compare the CMIP5 and CMIP6 model ensembles and find
a systematic shift between CMIP eras to be unexplained as a process of random sampling from modeled forcing and feedback distributions. Instead,
shortwave feedbacks shift towards more positive values, in particular over the Southern Ocean, driving the shift towards larger ECS values in many
of the models. These results suggest that changes in model treatment of mixed-phase cloud processes and changes to Antarctic sea ice representation
are likely causes of the shift towards larger ECS. Somewhat surprisingly, CMIP6 models exhibit less historical warming than CMIP5 models, despite an
increase in TCR between CMIP eras (mean TCR increased from 1.7 to 1.9 K). The evolution of the warming suggests, however, that several of
the CMIP6 models apply too strong aerosol cooling, resulting in too weak mid-20th century warming compared to the instrumental
record.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council European Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Andrews, T., Andrews, M. B., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Jones, G. S., Kulhbrodt, T., Manners, J., Menary, M. B., Ridley, J., Ringer, M. A., Sellar, A. A., Senior, C. A., and Tang, Y.:
Forcings, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in HadGEM3-GC3.1 and UKESM1,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4377–4394, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001866, 2109. a 2. Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Webb, M. J., and Taylor, K. E.:
Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L09712, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051607, 2012. a 3. Armour, K. C.:
Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks,
Nat. Clim. Change,
7, 1758–6798, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3278, 2017. a 4. Arrhenius, S.:
XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground,
The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science,
41, 237–276, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786449608620846, 1896. a 5. Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K., Christensen, M., Daniau, A.-L., Dufresne, J.-L., Feingold, G., Fiedler, S., Forster, P., Gettelman, A., Haywood, J., Lohmann, U., Malavelle, F., Mauritsen, T., McCoy, D., Myhre, G., Mülmenstädt, J., Neubauer, D., Possner, A., Rugenstein, M., Sato, Y., Schulz, M., Schwartz, S., Sourdeval, O., Storelvmo, T., Toll, V., Winker, D., and Stevens, B.:
Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change,
Rev. Geophys.,
58, e2019RG000660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000660, 2019. a
Cited by
95 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|