Microphysical properties of three types of snow clouds: implication for satellite snowfall retrievals
-
Published:2020-11-30
Issue:23
Volume:20
Page:14491-14507
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Jeoung HwayoungORCID, Liu GuoshengORCID, Kim KwonilORCID, Lee Gyuwon, Seo Eun-Kyoung
Abstract
Abstract. Ground-based radar and radiometer data observed during the 2017–2018 winter
season over the Pyeongchang area on the east coast of the Korean Peninsula were
used to simultaneously estimate both the cloud liquid water path and snowfall
rate for three types of snow clouds: near-surface, shallow, and deep.
Surveying all the observed data, it is found that near-surface clouds are the
most frequently observed cloud type with an area fraction of over 60 %,
while deep clouds contribute the most in snowfall volume with about 50 %
of the total. The probability distributions of snowfall rates are clearly
different among the three types of clouds, with the vast majority hardly
reaching 0.3 mm h−1 (liquid water equivalent snowfall rate) for
near-surface, 0.5 mm h−1 for shallow, and 1 mm h−1 for deep
clouds. However, the liquid water paths in the three types of clouds all have the
substantial probability to reach 500 g m−2. There is no clear
correlation found between snowfall rate and the liquid water path for any of the
cloud types. Based on all observed snow profiles, brightness temperatures at
Global Precipitation Measurement Microwave Imager (GPM/GMI) channels are simulated,
and the ability of a Bayesian algorithm to retrieve snowfall rate is
examined using half the profiles as observations and the other half as an a priori
database. Under an idealized scenario, i.e., without considering the
uncertainties caused by surface emissivity, ice particle size distribution,
and particle shape, the study found that the correlation as expressed by
R2 between the “retrieved” and “observed” snowfall rates is about
0.32, 0.41, and 0.62, respectively, for near-surface, shallow, and deep
snow clouds over land surfaces; these numbers basically indicate the upper
limits capped by cloud natural variability, to which the retrieval skill of
a Bayesian retrieval algorithm can reach. A hypothetical retrieval for the
same clouds but over ocean is also studied, and a major improvement in
skills is found for near-surface clouds with R2 increasing from 0.32 to
0.52, while a smaller improvement is found for shallow and deep clouds. This
study provides a general picture of the microphysical characteristics of the
different types of snow clouds and points out the associated challenges
in retrieving their snowfall rate from passive microwave observations.
Funder
Korea Meteorological Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference69 articles.
1. Battaglia, A., Rustemeier, E., Tokay, A., Blahak, U., and Simmer, C.:
PARSIVEL snow observations: A critical assessment, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 27, 333–344, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1332.1, 2010. 2. Bennartz, R. and Bauer, P.: Sensitivity of microwave radiances at 85-183 GHz
to precipitating ice particles, Radio Sci., 38, 8075,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002rs002626, 2003. 3. Casella, D., Panegrossi, G., Sanò, P., Marra, A. C., Dietrich, S.,
Johnson, B. T., and Kulie, M. S.: Evaluation of the GPM-DPR snowfall
detection capability: Comparison with CloudSat-CPR, Atmos. Res., 197,
64–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.018, 2017. 4. Chen, H., Chandrasekar, V., and Bechini, R.: An improved dual-polarization
radar rainfall algorithm (DROPS2.0): Application in NASA IFloodS field
campaign, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 917–937, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0124.1, 2017. 5. Chen, S., Hong, Y., Kulie, M., Behrangi, A., Stepanian, P. M., Cao, Q., You,
Y., Zhang, J., Hu, J., and Zhang, X.: Comparison of snowfall estimates from
the NASA CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and NOAA/NSSL Multi-Radar
Multi-Sensor System, J. Hydrol., 541, 862–872,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.047, 2016.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|