Intercomparison of atmospheric trace gas dispersion models: Barnett Shale case study
-
Published:2019-02-28
Issue:4
Volume:19
Page:2561-2576
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Karion AnnaORCID, Lauvaux ThomasORCID, Lopez Coto Israel, Sweeney ColmORCID, Mueller Kimberly, Gourdji Sharon, Angevine WayneORCID, Barkley Zachary, Deng Aijun, Andrews Arlyn, Stein Ariel, Whetstone JamesORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation requires understanding
the dominant processes controlling fluxes of these trace gases at increasingly
finer spatial and temporal scales. Trace gas fluxes can be estimated using a
variety of approaches that translate observed atmospheric species mole
fractions into fluxes or emission rates, often identifying the spatial and
temporal characteristics of the emission sources as well. Meteorological
models are commonly combined with tracer dispersion models to estimate fluxes
using an inverse approach that optimizes emissions to best fit the trace gas
mole fraction observations. One way to evaluate the accuracy of atmospheric
flux estimation methods is to compare results from independent methods,
including approaches in which different meteorological and tracer dispersion
models are used. In this work, we use a rich data set of atmospheric methane
observations collected during an intensive airborne campaign to compare
different methane emissions estimates from the Barnett Shale oil and natural
gas production basin in Texas, USA. We estimate emissions based on a variety
of different meteorological and dispersion models. Previous estimates of
methane emissions from this region relied on a simple model (a mass balance
analysis) as well as on ground-based measurements and statistical data
analysis (an inventory). We find that in addition to meteorological model
choice, the choice of tracer dispersion model also has a significant impact
on the predicted downwind methane concentrations given the same emissions
field. The dispersion models tested often underpredicted the observed
methane enhancements with significant variability (up to a factor of 3)
between different models and between different days. We examine possible
causes for this result and find that the models differ in their simulation of
vertical dispersion, indicating that additional work is needed to evaluate
and improve vertical mixing in the tracer dispersion models commonly used in
regional trace gas flux inversions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Ahmadov, R., McKeen, S., Trainer, M., Banta, R., Brewer, A., Brown, S.,
Edwards, P. M., de Gouw, J. A., Frost, G. J., Gilman, J., Helmig, D.,
Johnson, B., Karion, A., Koss, A., Langford, A., Lerner, B., Olson, J.,
Oltmans, S., Peischl, J., Pétron, G., Pichugina, Y., Roberts, J. M.,
Ryerson, T., Schnell, R., Senff, C., Sweeney, C., Thompson, C., Veres, P. R.,
Warneke, C., Wild, R., Williams, E. J., Yuan, B., and Zamora, R.:
Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil- and natural
gas-producing region of the western US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 411–429,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-411-2015, 2015. 2. Angevine, W. M., Brioude, J., McKeen, S., and Holloway, J. S.: Uncertainty in
Lagrangian pollutant transport simulations due to meteorological uncertainty
from a mesoscale WRF ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2817–2829,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2817-2014, 2014. 3. Barkley, Z. R., Lauvaux, T., Davis, K. J., Deng, A., Miles, N. L.,
Richardson, S. J., Cao, Y., Sweeney, C., Karion, A., Smith, M., Kort, E. A.,
Schwietzke, S., Murphy, T., Cervone, G., Martins, D., and Maasakkers, J. D.:
Quantifying methane emissions from natural gas production in north-eastern
Pennsylvania, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13941–13966,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13941-2017, 2017. 4. Brandt, A. R., Heath, G. A., Kort, E. A., O'Sullivan, F., Petron, G.,
Jordaan, S. M., Tans, P., Wilcox, J., Gopstein, A. M., Arent, D., Wofsy, S.,
Brown, N. J., Bradley, R., Stucky, G. D., Eardley, D., and Harriss, R.:
Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems, Science, 343,
733–735, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247045, 2014. 5. Bruhwiler, L. M., Basu, S., Bergamaschi, P., Bousquet, P., Dlugokencky, E.,
Houweling, S., Ishizawa, M., Kim, H. S., Locatelli, R., Maksyutov, S.,
Montzka, S., Pandey, S., Patra, P. K., Petron, G., Saunois, M., Sweeney, C.,
Schwietzke, S., Tans, P., and Weatherhead, E. C.: U.S. CH4 emissions
from oil and gas production: Have recent large increases been detected?, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4070–4083, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026157, 2017.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|