Combined UV and IR ozone profile retrieval from TROPOMI and CrIS measurements
-
Published:2022-05-12
Issue:9
Volume:15
Page:2955-2978
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Mettig Nora, Weber MarkORCID, Rozanov AlexeiORCID, Burrows John P.ORCID, Veefkind PepijnORCID, Thompson Anne M.ORCID, Stauffer Ryan M.ORCID, Leblanc Thierry, Ancellet GerardORCID, Newchurch Michael J., Kuang ShiORCID, Kivi RigelORCID, Tully Matthew B.ORCID, Van Malderen RoelandORCID, Piters Ankie, Kois Bogumil, Stübi René, Skrivankova Pavla
Abstract
Abstract. Vertical ozone profiles from combined spectral measurements in the ultraviolet and infrared spectral range were retrieved by using data from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument on the Sentinel-5 Precursor (TROPOMI/S5P) and the Cross-track Infrared Sounder on the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (CrIS/Suomi-NPP), which are flying in loose formation 3 min apart in the same orbit. A previous study of ozone profiles retrieved exclusively from TROPOMI UV spectra showed that the vertical resolution in the troposphere is clearly limited (Mettig et al., 2021). The vertical resolution and the vertical extent of the ozone profiles is improved by combining both wavelength ranges compared to retrievals limited to UV or IR spectral data only. The combined retrieval particularly improves the accuracy of the retrieved tropospheric ozone and to a lesser degree stratospheric ozone up to 30 km. An increase in the degrees of freedom (DOF) by 1 DOF was found in the UV + IR retrieval compared to the UV-only retrieval.
Compared to previous publications, which investigated combinations of UV and IR observations from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument and Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (OMI and TES) and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment version 2 and Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (GOME-2 and IASI) pairs, the degree of freedom is lower, which is attributed to the reduced spectral resolution of CrIS compared to TES or IASI.
Tropospheric lidar and ozonesondes were used to validate the ozone profiles and tropospheric ozone content (TOC). In their comparison with tropospheric lidars, both ozone profiles and TOCs show smaller biases for the retrieved data from the combined UV + IR observation than from the UV observations alone. For the ozone profiles below 10 km, the mean differences are around ±10 % and the mean TOC varies around ±3 DU.
We show that TOCs from the combined retrieval agree better with ozonesonde results at northern latitudes than the UV-only and IR-only retrievals and also have lower scatter. In the tropics, the IR-only retrieval shows the best agrement with TOCs derived from ozonesondes.
While in general the TOCs show good agreement with ozonesonde data, the profiles have a positive bias of around 30 % between 10 and 15 km.
The reason is probably a positive stratospheric bias from the IR retrieval.
The comparison of the UV + IR and UV ozone profiles up to 30 km with the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) demonstrates the improvement of the UV + IR profile in the stratosphere above 18 km. In comparison to the UV-only approach the retrieval shows improvements of up to 10 % depending on latitude but can also show worse results in some regions and latitudes.
Funder
Freie Hansestadt Bremen Universität Bremen Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference74 articles.
1. Barnet, C.: Sounder SIPS: Suomi NPP CrIMSS Level 2 CLIMCAPS Full Spectral
Resolution: Atmosphere cloud and surface geophysical state V2, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5067/62SPJFQW5Q9B, 2019a. a, b, c, d, e 2. Barnet, C.: Sounder SIPS: Suomi NPP CrIMSS Level 2 CLIMCAPS Full Spectral
Resolution: Cloud Cleared Radiances V2, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/ATJX1J10VOMU,
2019b. a, b 3. Bowman, K. W., Steck, T., Worden, H. M., Worden, J., Clough, S., and Rodgers,
C.: Capturing time and vertical variability of tropospheric ozone: A study
using TES nadir retrievals, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH21-1–ACH21-11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002150, 2002. a 4. Bowman, K. W., Rodgers, C. D., Kulawik, S. S., Worden, J., Sarkissian, E.,
Osterman, G., Steck, T., Lou, M., Eldering, A., Shephard, M., Worden, H.,
Lampel, M., Clough, S., Brown, P., Rinsland, C., Gunson, M., and Beer, R.:
Tropospheric emission spectrometer: retrieval method and error analysis, IEEE
Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 1297–1307,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.871234, 2006. a 5. Boynard, A., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Hurtmans, D., Turquety, S., George, M., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Keim, C., and Meyer-Arnek, J.: Measurements of total and tropospheric ozone from IASI: comparison with correlative satellite, ground-based and ozonesonde observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6255–6271, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6255-2009, 2009. a
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|