Bimodality in ensemble forecasts of 2 m temperature: identification
-
Published:2021-12-15
Issue:4
Volume:2
Page:1209-1224
-
ISSN:2698-4016
-
Container-title:Weather and Climate Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Weather Clim. Dynam.
Author:
Bertossa Cameron, Hitchcock PeterORCID, DeGaetano Arthur, Plougonven Riwal
Abstract
Abstract. Bimodality and other types of non-Gaussianity arise in ensemble forecasts of the atmosphere as a result of nonlinear spread across ensemble members. In this paper, bimodality in 50-member ECMWF ENS-extended ensemble forecasts is identified and characterized. Forecasts of 2 m temperature are found to exhibit widespread bimodality well over a derived false-positive rate. In some regions bimodality occurs in excess of
30 % of forecasts, with the largest rates occurring during lead times of 2 to 3 weeks. Bimodality occurs more frequently in the winter hemisphere with indications of baroclinicity being a factor to its development. Additionally, bimodality is more common over the ocean, especially the polar oceans, which may indicate development caused by boundary conditions (such as sea ice). Near the equatorial region, bimodality remains common during either season and follows similar patterns to the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), suggesting convection as a possible source for its development. Over some continental regions the modes of the forecasts are
separated by up to 15 ∘C. The probability density for the modes
can be up to 4 times greater than at the minimum between the modes, which lies near the ensemble mean. The widespread presence of such bimodality has potentially important implications for decision makers acting on these forecasts. Bimodality also has implications for assessing forecast skill and for statistical postprocessing: several commonly used skill-scoring methods and ensemble dressing methods are found to perform poorly in the presence of bimodality, suggesting the need for improvements in how non-Gaussian ensemble forecasts are evaluated.
Funder
Cornell Institute for Digital Agriculture, Cornell University
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference40 articles.
1. Aguirre, C., Rojas, M., Garreaud, R. D., and Rahn, D. A.: Role of synoptic
activity on projected changes in upwelling-favourable winds at the ocean’s
eastern boundaries, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0101-9, 2019. a 2. Allen, S., Ferro, C. A., and Kwasniok, F.: Regime-dependent statistical
post-processing of ensemble forecasts, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145,
3535–3552, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3638, 2019. a 3. Birchfield, G. E., Wyant, M., and Wang, H.: A coupled ocean-atmosphere box
model of the Atlantic Ocean: a bimodal climate response, J. Mar. Syst., 1,
197–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-7963(90)90255-9, 1990. a 4. Buizza, R.: Ensemble forecasting and the need for calibration, in: Statistical postprocessing of ensemble forecasts, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Oxford, Cambridge, USA, 15–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812372-0.00002-9, 2018. a 5. Chatrchyan, A. M., Erlebacher, R. C., Chaopricha, N. T., Chan, J., Tobin, D.,
and Allred, S. B.: United States agricultural stakeholder views and decisions
on climate change, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Clim. Change, 8, e469,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.469, 2017. a
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|