Analysis of systematic biases in tropospheric hydrostatic delay models and construction of a correction model
-
Published:2023-02-24
Issue:4
Volume:16
Page:1345-1358
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Fan HaopengORCID, Li Siran, Sun Zhongmiao, Xiao GuoruiORCID, Li Xinxing, Liu Xiaogang
Abstract
Abstract. In the field of space geodetic techniques, such as
global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs), tropospheric zenith hydrostatic
delay (ZHD) is chosen as the a priori value of tropospheric total delay.
Therefore, the inaccuracy of ZHD will definitely affect parameters like the
wet delay and the horizontal gradient of tropospheric delay, accompanied by
an indirect influence on the accuracy of geodetic parameters, if not dealt
with well at low elevation angles. In fact, however, the most widely used
ZHD model currently seems to contain millimeter-level biases from the
precise integral method. We explored the bias of traditional ZHD models and
analyzed the characteristics in different aspects on a global annual scale.
It was found that biases differ significantly with season and geographical
location, and the difference between the maximum and minimum values exceeds
30 mm, which should be fully considered in the field of high-precision
measurement. Then, we constructed a global grid correction model, which is
named ZHD_crct, based on the meteorological data of the year 2020
from the ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts), and it
turned out that the bias of traditional models in the current year could be
reduced by ∼ 50 % when the ZHD_crct was
added. When we verified the effect of ZHD_crct on the biases
in the next year, it worked almost the same as the former year. The mean
absolute biases (MABs) of ZHD will be narrowed within ∼ 0.5 mm
for most regions, and the SDs (standard deviations) will be within
∼ 0.7 mm. This improvement will be helpful for research on
meteorological phenomena as well.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference58 articles.
1. Abdelfatah, M. A., Mousa, A. E., and El-Fiky, G. S.: Precise troposphere
delay model for Egypt, as derived from radiosonde data, NRIAG J. Astron.
Geophys., 4, 16–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2015.01.002, 2015. 2. Alizadeh, M., Wijaya, D., Hobiger, T., Weber, R., and Schuh, H.: Atmospheric
Effects in Space Geodesy, Edition 2013, edited by: Böhm, J. and Schuh, H., Springer, 35–71, ISBN 978-3-642-36931-5,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36932-2_2, 2013. 3. Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model:
Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis, National Geophysical Data Center,
NOAA [data set], https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M, 2009. 4. Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A.,
and Wood, E. F.: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification
maps at 1-km resolution, Sci. Data, 5, 180214, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018. 5. Bekaert, D. P. S., Hooper, A., and Wright, T. J.: A spatially variable power
law tropospheric correction technique for InSAR data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 1345–1356, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011558, 2015.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|