Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

Author:

Stevenson D. S.,Young P. J.ORCID,Naik V.,Lamarque J.-F.ORCID,Shindell D. T.ORCID,Voulgarakis A.,Skeie R. B.ORCID,Dalsoren S. B.,Myhre G.ORCID,Berntsen T. K.,Folberth G. A.ORCID,Rumbold S. T.,Collins W. J.ORCID,MacKenzie I. A.,Doherty R. M.,Zeng G.ORCID,van Noije T. P. C.,Strunk A.,Bergmann D.,Cameron-Smith P.,Plummer D. A.ORCID,Strode S. A.ORCID,Horowitz L.,Lee Y. H.,Szopa S.ORCID,Sudo K.ORCID,Nagashima T.,Josse B.,Cionni I.,Righi M.ORCID,Eyring V.ORCID,Conley A.ORCID,Bowman K. W.ORCID,Wild O.ORCID,Archibald A.

Abstract

Abstract. Ozone (O3) from 17 atmospheric chemistry models taking part in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) has been used to calculate tropospheric ozone radiative forcings (RFs). All models applied a common set of anthropogenic emissions, which are better constrained for the present-day than the past. Future anthropogenic emissions follow the four Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios, which define a relatively narrow range of possible air pollution emissions. We calculate a value for the pre-industrial (1750) to present-day (2010) tropospheric ozone RF of 410 mW m−2. The model range of pre-industrial to present-day changes in O3 produces a spread (±1 standard deviation) in RFs of ±17%. Three different radiation schemes were used – we find differences in RFs between schemes (for the same ozone fields) of ±10%. Applying two different tropopause definitions gives differences in RFs of ±3%. Given additional (unquantified) uncertainties associated with emissions, climate-chemistry interactions and land-use change, we estimate an overall uncertainty of ±30% for the tropospheric ozone RF. Experiments carried out by a subset of six models attribute tropospheric ozone RF to increased emissions of methane (44±12%), nitrogen oxides (31 ± 9%), carbon monoxide (15 ± 3%) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (9 ± 2%); earlier studies attributed more of the tropospheric ozone RF to methane and less to nitrogen oxides. Normalising RFs to changes in tropospheric column ozone, we find a global mean normalised RF of 42 mW m−2 DU−1, a value similar to previous work. Using normalised RFs and future tropospheric column ozone projections we calculate future tropospheric ozone RFs (mW m−2; relative to 1750) for the four future scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5) of 350, 420, 370 and 460 (in 2030), and 200, 300, 280 and 600 (in 2100). Models show some coherent responses of ozone to climate change: decreases in the tropical lower troposphere, associated with increases in water vapour; and increases in the sub-tropical to mid-latitude upper troposphere, associated with increases in lightning and stratosphere-to-troposphere transport. Climate change has relatively small impacts on global mean tropospheric ozone RF.

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference99 articles.

1. Andersson, C. and Engardt, M.: European ozone in a future climate: Importance of changes in dry deposition and isoprene emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D02303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011690, 2010.

2. Anfossi, D., Sandroni, S., and Viarengo, S.: Tropospheric ozone in the nineteenth century: the Moncalieri series, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 17349–17352, 1991.

3. Arneth, A., Sitch, S., Bondeau, A., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Foster, P., Gedney, N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Prentice, I. C., Sanderson, M., Thonicke, K., Wania, R., and Zaehle, S.: From biota to chemistry and climate: towards a comprehensive description of trace gas exchange between the biosphere and atmosphere, Biogeosciences, 7, 121–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-121-2010, 2010.

4. Berntsen, T. K., Isaksen, I. S. A., Myhre, G., Fuglestvedt, J., Stordal, F., Larsen, T., Freckleton, R., and Shine, K. P.: Effects of anthropogenic emissions on tropospheric ozone and its radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28101–28126, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02226, 1997.

5. Bowman, K., Shindell, D., Worden, H., Lamarque, J. F., Young, P. J., Stevenson, D., Qu, Z., de la Torre, M., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Collins, W. J., Doherty, R., Dalsøren, S., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I., Myhre, G., Nagashima, T., Naik, V., Plummer, D., Rumbold, S., Skeie, R., Strode, S., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Voulgarakis, A., Zeng, G., Kulawik, S., and Worden, J.: Observational constraints on ozone radiative forcing from the Atmospheric Chemistry Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 23603–23644, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-23603-2012, 2012.

Cited by 323 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3