Assessing the value meteorological ensembles add to dispersion modelling using hypothetical releases
-
Published:2022-01-14
Issue:1
Volume:22
Page:577-596
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Leadbetter Susan J.ORCID, Jones Andrew R., Hort Matthew C.
Abstract
Abstract. Atmospheric dispersion model output is frequently used to provide advice to decision makers, for example, about the likely location of volcanic ash erupted from a volcano or the location of deposits of radioactive material released during a nuclear accident. Increasingly, scientists and decision makers are requesting information on the uncertainty of these dispersion model predictions. One source of uncertainty is in the meteorology used to drive the dispersion model, and in this study ensemble meteorology from the Met Office ensemble prediction system is used to provide meteorological uncertainty to dispersion model predictions. Two hypothetical scenarios, one volcanological and one radiological, are repeated every 12 h over a period of 4 months. The scenarios are simulated using ensemble meteorology and deterministic forecast meteorology and compared to output from simulations using analysis meteorology using the Brier skill score. Adopting the practice commonly used in evaluating numerical weather prediction (NWP) models where observations are sparse or non-existent, we consider output from simulations using analysis NWP data to be truth. The results show that on average the ensemble simulations perform better than the deterministic simulations, although not all individual ensemble simulations outperform their deterministic counterpart. The results also show that greater skill scores are achieved by the ensemble simulation for later time steps rather than earlier time steps. In addition there is a greater increase in skill score over time for deposition than for air concentration. For the volcanic ash scenarios it is shown that the performance of the ensemble at one flight level can be different to that at a different flight level; e.g. a negative skill score might be obtained for FL350-550 and a positive skill score for FL200-350. This study does not take into account any source term uncertainty, but it does take the first steps towards demonstrating the value of ensemble dispersion model predictions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Beckett, F. M., Witham, C. S., Leadbetter, S. J., Crocker, R., Webster, H. N.,
Hort, M. C., Jones, A. R., Devenish, B. J., and Thomson, D. J.: Atmospheric
dispersion modelling at the London VAAC: A review of developments since the
2010 eyjafjallajökull volcano ash cloud, Atmosphere, 11, 352,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040352, 2020. a, b, c 2. Bowler, N. E., Cullen, M. J. P., and Piccolo, C.: Verification against perturbed analyses and observations, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 22, 403–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-403-2015, 2015. a 3. Brier, G. W.: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability,
Mon. Weather Rev., 78, 1–3,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2, 1950. a 4. Clarkson, R. and Simpson, H.: Maximising Airspace Use During Volcanic Eruptions: Matching Engine Durability against Ash Cloud Occurrence, NATO unclassified, available at: https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Proceedings/STO-MP-AVT-272/MP-AVT-272-17.pdf (last access: 12 January 2022),
2017. a 5. Dacre, H. F. and Harvey, N. J.: Characterizing the atmospheric conditions
leading to large error growth in volcanic ash cloud forecasts, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 57, 1011–1019,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0298.1, 2018. a
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|