Toward seamless hydrologic predictions across spatial scales
-
Published:2017-09-01
Issue:9
Volume:21
Page:4323-4346
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Samaniego LuisORCID, Kumar RohiniORCID, Thober StephanORCID, Rakovec OldrichORCID, Zink MatthiasORCID, Wanders NikoORCID, Eisner StephanieORCID, Müller Schmied HannesORCID, Sutanudjaja Edwin H.ORCID, Warrach-Sagi Kirsten, Attinger Sabine
Abstract
Abstract. Land surface and hydrologic models (LSMs/HMs) are used at diverse spatial resolutions ranging from catchment-scale (1–10 km) to global-scale (over 50 km) applications. Applying the same model structure at different spatial scales requires that the model estimates similar fluxes independent of the chosen resolution, i.e., fulfills a flux-matching condition across scales. An analysis of state-of-the-art LSMs and HMs reveals that most do not have consistent hydrologic parameter fields. Multiple experiments with the mHM, Noah-MP, PCR-GLOBWB, and WaterGAP models demonstrate the pitfalls of deficient parameterization practices currently used in most operational models, which are insufficient to satisfy the flux-matching condition. These examples demonstrate that J. Dooge's 1982 statement on the unsolved problem of parameterization in these models remains true. Based on a review of existing parameter regionalization techniques, we postulate that the multiscale parameter regionalization (MPR) technique offers a practical and robust method that provides consistent (seamless) parameter and flux fields across scales. Herein, we develop a general model protocol to describe how MPR can be applied to a particular model and present an example application using the PCR-GLOBWB model. Finally, we discuss potential advantages and limitations of MPR in obtaining the seamless prediction of hydrological fluxes and states across spatial scales.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference125 articles.
1. Abdulla, F. and Lettenmaier, D.: Development of regional parameter estimation equations for a macroscale hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 197, 230–257, 1997. 2. Addor, N., Rössler, O., Köplin, N., Huss, M., Weingartner, R., and Seibert, J.: Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7541–7562, 2014. 3. Andréassian, V., Bourgin, F., Oudin, L., Mathevet, T., Perrin, C., Lerat, J., Coron, L., and Berthet, L.: Seeking genericity in the selection of parameter sets: Impact on hydrological model efficiency, Water Resour. Res., 50, 8356–8366, 2014. 4. Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.: A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions, in: Progress in Photosynthesis Research, Springer, the Netherlands, Dordrecht, 221–224, 1987. 5. Barrios, M. and Francés, F.: Spatial scale effect on the upper soil effective parameters of a distributed hydrological model, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1022–1033, 2011.
Cited by
91 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|