Factors influencing test porosity in planktonic foraminifera
-
Published:2018-11-07
Issue:21
Volume:15
Page:6607-6619
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Burke Janet E., Renema Willem, Henehan Michael J.ORCID, Elder Leanne E., Davis Catherine V.ORCID, Maas Amy E.ORCID, Foster Gavin L.ORCID, Schiebel Ralf, Hull Pincelli M.
Abstract
Abstract. The clustering of mitochondria near pores in the test walls of foraminifera
suggests that these perforations play a critical role in metabolic gas
exchange. As such, pore measurements could provide a novel means of tracking
changes in metabolic rate in the fossil record. However, in planktonic
foraminifera, variation in average pore area, density, and porosity (the
total percentage of a test wall that is open pore space) have been variously
attributed to environmental, biological, and taxonomic drivers, complicating
such an interpretation. Here we examine the environmental, biological, and
evolutionary determinants of pore characteristics in 718 individuals,
representing 17 morphospecies of planktonic foraminifera from 6 core tops in
the North Atlantic. Using random forest models, we find that porosity is
primarily correlated to test surface area, test volume, and habitat
temperature, key factors in determining metabolic rates. In order to test if
this correlation arose spuriously through the association of cryptic species
with distinct biomes, we cultured Globigerinoides ruber in three
different temperature conditions, and found that porosity increased with
temperature. Crucially, these results show that porosity can be plastic:
changing in response to environmental drivers within the lifetime of an
individual foraminifer. This demonstrates the potential of porosity as a
proxy for foraminiferal metabolic rates, with significance for interpreting
geochemical data and the physiology of foraminifera in non-analog
environments. It also highlights the importance of phenotypic plasticity
(i.e., ecophenotypy) in accounting for some aspects of morphological
variation in the modern and fossil record.
Funder
Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference80 articles.
1. Agutter, P. S. and Wheatley, D. N.: Metabolic scaling: consensus or
controversy?, Theor. Biol. Med. Model., 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-1-13,
2004. 2. Anagnostou, E., John, E. H., Edgar, K. M., Foster, G. L., Ridgwell, A.,
Inglis, G. N., Pancost, R. D., Lunt, D. J., and Pearson, P. N.: Changing
atmospheric CO2 concentration was the primary driver of early Cenozoic
climate, Nature, 533, 380–384, 2016. 3. Aze, T., Ezard, T. H., Purvis, A., Coxall, H. K., Stewart, D. R., Wade, B.
S., and Pearson, P. N.: A phylogeny of Cenozoic macroperforate planktonic
foraminifera from fossil data, Biol. Rev., 86, 900–927, 2011. 4. Bé, A. W.: Shell porosity of Recent planktonic foraminifera as a climatic
index, Science, 161, 881–884, 1968. 5. Bé, A.: Gametogenic calcification in a spinose planktonic foraminifer,
Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady), Mar. Micropaleontol., 5, 283–310, 1980.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|