Verification of weather-radar-based hail metrics with crowdsourced observations from Switzerland
-
Published:2024-07-30
Issue:14
Volume:17
Page:4529-4552
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Kopp JérômeORCID, Hering Alessandro, Germann UrsORCID, Martius Olivia
Abstract
Abstract. Remote hail detection and hail size estimation using weather radar observations has the advantage of wide spatial coverage and high spatial and temporal resolution. Switzerland's National Weather Service (MeteoSwiss) uses two radar-based hail metrics: the probability of hail on the ground (POH) to assess the presence of hail and the maximum expected severe hailstone size (MESHS) to estimate the largest hailstone diameter. However, radar-based metrics are not direct measurements of hail and have to be calibrated with and verified against ground-based observations of hail, such as crowdsourced hail reports. Switzerland benefits from a particularly rich and dense dataset of crowdsourced hail reports from the MeteoSwiss app. We combine a new spatiotemporal clustering method (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise, ST-DBSCAN) with radar reflectivity to filter the reports and use the filtered reports to verify POH and MESHS in terms of the hit rate, false-alarm ratio (FAR), critical success index (CSI), and Heidke skill score (HSS). Using a 4 km × 4 km maximum upscaling approach, we find FAR values between 0.3 and 0.7 for POH and FAR > 0.6 for MESHS. For POH, the highest CSI (0.37) and HSS (0.52) are obtained using a 60 % threshold, while for MESHS the highest CSI (0.25) and HSS (0.4) are obtained using a 2 cm threshold. We find that the current calibration of POH does not correspond to a probability and suggest a recalibration based on the filtered reports.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference56 articles.
1. Ackermann, L., Soderholm, J., Protat, A., Whitley, R., Ye, L., and Ridder, N.: Radar and environment-based hail damage estimates using machine learning, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 407–422, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-407-2024, 2024. a, b, c 2. Allen, J. T., Giammanco, I. M., Kumjian, M. R., Jurgen Punge, H., Zhang, Q., Groenemeijer, P., Kunz, M., and Ortega, K.: Understanding Hail in the Earth System, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000665, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000665, 2020. a, b, c, d 3. Al-Sakka, H., Boumahmoud, A.-A., Fradon, B., Frasier, S. J., and Tabary, P.: A New Fuzzy Logic Hydrometeor Classification Scheme Applied to the French X-, C-, and S-Band Polarimetric Radars, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 52, 2328–2344, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0236.1, 2013. a 4. Barras, H., Hering, A., Martynov, A., Noti, P.-A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: Experiences with > 50 000 Crowdsourced Hail Reports in Switzerland, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1429–1440, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0090.1, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q 5. Besic, N., Figueras i Ventura, J., Grazioli, J., Gabella, M., Germann, U., and Berne, A.: Hydrometeor classification through statistical clustering of polarimetric radar measurements: a semi-supervised approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4425–4445, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4425-2016, 2016. a, b
|
|