Mapping groundwater abstractions from irrigated agriculture: big data, inverse modeling, and a satellite–model fusion approach
-
Published:2020-11-12
Issue:11
Volume:24
Page:5251-5277
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
López Valencia Oliver MiguelORCID, Johansen KasperORCID, Aragón Solorio Bruno José LuisORCID, Li Ting, Houborg RasmusORCID, Malbeteau Yoann, AlMashharawi Samer, Altaf Muhammad Umer, Fallatah Essam Mohammed, Dasari Hari Prasad, Hoteit Ibrahim, McCabe Matthew FrancisORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The agricultural sector in Saudi Arabia has witnessed rapid growth in both production and area under cultivation over the last few decades. This has prompted some concern over the state and
future availability of fossil groundwater resources, which have been used to drive this
expansion. Large-scale studies using satellite gravimetric data show a declining trend over this
region. However, water management agencies require much more detailed information on both the
spatial distribution of agricultural fields and their varying levels of water exploitation through time than coarse gravimetric data can provide. Relying on self-reporting from farm
operators or sporadic data collection campaigns to obtain needed information are not feasible
options, nor do they allow for retrospective assessments. In this work, a water accounting
framework that combines satellite data, meteorological output from weather prediction models, and
a modified land surface hydrology model was developed to provide information on both irrigated crop water use and groundwater abstraction rates. Results from the local scale, comprising several thousand individual center-pivot fields, were then used to quantify the regional-scale response. To do this, a semi-automated approach for the delineation of center-pivot fields using a
multi-temporal statistical analysis of Landsat 8 data was developed. Next, actual crop evaporation
rates were estimated using a two-source energy balance (TSEB) model driven by leaf area index,
land surface temperature, and albedo, all of which were derived from Landsat 8. The
Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model was then adapted to use satellite-based
vegetation and related surface variables and forced with a 3 km reanalysis dataset from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Groundwater abstraction rates were then inferred
by estimating the irrigation supplied to each individual center pivot, which was determined via an optimization approach that considered CABLE-based estimates of evaporation and TSEB-based satellite estimates. The framework was applied over two study regions in Saudi Arabia: a
small-scale experimental facility of around 40 center pivots in Al Kharj that was used for an initial evaluation and a much larger agricultural region in Al Jawf province comprising more than 5000 individual fields across an area exceeding 2500 km2. Total groundwater abstraction
for the year 2015 in Al Jawf was estimated at approximately 5.5 billion cubic meters, far exceeding any recharge to the groundwater system and further highlighting the need for a
comprehensive water management strategy. Overall, this novel data–model fusion approach facilitates the compilation of national-scale groundwater abstractions while also detailing field-scale information that allows both farmers and water management agencies to make informed
water accounting decisions across multiple spatial and temporal scales.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference168 articles.
1. Abo-Ghobar, H. M.: Losses from low-pressure center-pivot irrigation systems in a desert
climate as affected by nozzle height, Agr. Water Manage., 21, 23–32, 1992. 2. Ajami, H., Evans, J. P., McCabe, M. F., and Stisen, S.: Technical Note: Reducing the
spin-up time of integrated surface water–groundwater models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18,
5169–5179, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5169-2014, 2014. 3. Ajami, H., McCabe, M. F., and Evans, J. P.: Impacts of model initialization on an
integrated surface water–groundwater model, Hydrol. Process., 29, 3790–3801,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10478, 2015. 4. Allen, R. G., Tasumi, M., and Trezza, R.: Satellite-based energy balance for mapping
evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)–Model, J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 133,
380–394, 2007. 5. Alley, W. M. and Konikow, L. F.: Bringing GRACE down to earth, Groundwater, 53,
826–829, 2015.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|