Hierarchical sensitivity analysis for a large-scale process-based hydrological model applied to an Amazonian watershed
-
Published:2020-10-23
Issue:10
Volume:24
Page:4971-4996
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Liu Haifan, Dai Heng, Niu Jie, Hu Bill X., Gui Dongwei, Qiu HanORCID, Ye Ming, Chen XingyuanORCID, Wu Chuanhao, Zhang Jin, Riley WilliamORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Sensitivity analysis methods have recently received much attention for identifying important uncertainty sources (or uncertain inputs) and improving
model calibrations and predictions for hydrological models. However, it is still challenging to apply the quantitative and comprehensive global
sensitivity analysis method to complex large-scale process-based hydrological models (PBHMs) because of its variant uncertainty sources and high
computational cost. Therefore, a global sensitivity analysis method that is capable of simultaneously analyzing multiple uncertainty sources of
PBHMs and providing quantitative sensitivity analysis results is still lacking. In an effort to develop a new tool for overcoming these weaknesses,
we improved the hierarchical sensitivity analysis method by defining a new set of sensitivity indices for subdivided parameters. A new binning
method and Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) were implemented for estimating these new sensitivity indices. For test and demonstration purposes, this
improved global sensitivity analysis method was implemented to quantify three different uncertainty sources (parameters, models, and climate
scenarios) of a three-dimensional large-scale process-based hydrologic model (Process-based Adaptive Watershed Simulator, PAWS) with an application case in an ∼ 9000 km2
Amazon catchment. The importance of different uncertainty sources was quantified by sensitivity indices for two hydrologic outputs of interest:
evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater contribution to streamflow (QG). The results show that the parameters, especially the
vadose zone parameters, are the most important uncertainty contributors for both outputs. In addition, the influence of climate scenarios on
ET predictions is also important. Furthermore, the thickness of the aquifers is important for QG predictions, especially in
main stream areas. These sensitivity analysis results provide useful information for modelers, and our method is mathematically rigorous and can be
applied to other large-scale hydrological models.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference84 articles.
1. Ba, S., Myers, W. R., and Brenneman, W. A.:
Optimal sliced Latin hypercube designs,
Technometrics,
57, 479–487, 2015. 2. Baroni, G. and Tarantola, S.:
A General Probabilistic Framework for uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis of deterministic models: a hydrological case study,
Environ. Modell. Softw.,
51, 26–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.022, 2014. 3. Beven, K.:
Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system,
Hydrol. Process.,
16, 189–206, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.343, 2002. 4. Bixio, A., Gambolati, G., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., Shestopalov, V., Bublias, V., Bohuslavsky, A., Kasteltseva, N., and Rudenko, Y.:
Modeling groundwater-surface water interactions including effects of morphogenetic depressions in the Chernobyl exclusion zone,
Environ. Geol.,
42, 162–177, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-001-0486-7, 2002. 5. Brunke, M. A., Broxton, P., Pelletier, J., Gochis, D., Hazenberg, P., Lawrence, D. M., Leung, L. R., Niu, G.-Y., Troch, P. A., and Zeng, X.:
Implementing and evaluating variable soil thickness in the community land model, Version 4.5 (CLM4.5),
J. Climate,
29, 3441–3461, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-15-0307.1, 2016.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|