Abstract
Abstract. Assessing the adverse impacts caused by tropical cyclones has become
increasingly important as both climate change and human coastal development
increase the damage potential. In order to assess tropical cyclone risk,
direct economic damage is frequently modeled based on hazard intensity,
asset exposure, and vulnerability, the latter represented by impact
functions. In this study, we show that assessing tropical cyclone risk on a
global level with one single impact function calibrated for the USA – which
is a typical approach in many recent studies – is problematic, biasing the
simulated damage by as much as a factor of 36 in the north West Pacific.
Thus, tropical cyclone risk assessments should always consider regional
differences in vulnerability, too. This study proposes a calibrated model to
adequately assess tropical cyclone risk in different regions by fitting
regional impact functions based on reported damage data. Applying regional
calibrated impact functions within the risk modeling framework CLIMADA (CLIMate ADAptation) at a
resolution of 10 km worldwide, we find global annual average direct damage
caused by tropical cyclones to range from USD 51 up to USD 121 billion (value in 2014, 1980–2017) with the largest uncertainties in the West
Pacific basin where the calibration results are the least robust. To better
understand the challenges in the West Pacific and to complement the global
perspective of this study, we explore uncertainties and limitations entailed
in the modeling setup for the case of the Philippines. While using wind as
a proxy for tropical cyclone hazard proves to be a valid approach in
general, the case of the Philippines reveals limitations of the model and
calibration due to the lack of an explicit representation of sub-perils such
as storm surges, torrential rainfall, and landslides. The globally consistent
methodology and calibrated regional impact functions are available online as
a Python package ready for application in practical contexts like physical
risk disclosure and providing more credible information for climate
adaptation studies.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference82 articles.
1. Abon, C. C., David, C. P. C., and Pellejera, N. E. B.: Reconstructing the Tropical Storm Ketsana flood event in Marikina River, Philippines, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1283–1289, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1283-2011, 2011.
2. Aznar-Siguan, G. and Bresch, D. N.: CLIMADA v1: a global weather and climate risk assessment platform, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3085–3097, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3085-2019, 2019.
3. Aznar-Siguan, G. and Bresch, D. N.: CLIMADA_python documentation, available at: https://climada-python.readthedocs.io/en/stable/, last access: 26 January 2021.
4. Aznar-Siguan, G., Bresch, D. N., Eberenz, S. and Röösli, T.:
CLIMADA-papers repository, GitHub, (202005), available at:
<span class="uri">https://github.com/CLIMADA-project/climada_papers</span>, last access: 9 July 2020.
5. Bagtasa, G.: Contribution of Tropical Cyclones to Rainfall in the
Philippines, J. Climate, 30, 3621–3633, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0150.1,
2017.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献