Abstract
Abstract. In these afterthoughts to a themed issue on the „Geographies of Post-Secularity“, I critically interrogate the analytical purchase of the terminology of post-secularism. I suggest that the concept of the post-secular is ill-suited to provide a vocabulary for multi-religious societies in the West as much as elsewhere. Instead, I suggest that the vocabulary of a descriptive political theology (Assmann) better helps us grasp the continuing negotiation of the dialectic relations between the secular and the religious. I illustrate this conceptual vocabulary for the study of religion and politics in the postcolonial world, first, in the political-normative debates on Indian secularism, and second, in the everyday struggles of religious actors in the violent politics of Sri Lanka's civil war, to then return to debates on (post-) secularity. I conclude that, indeed, we have never been secular – that the dialectic relations between the secular and the religious are bound to remain, and to become further complicated in increasingly multi-religious societies.
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Anthropology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference65 articles.
1. Adorno, T. W.: Vorlesungen über Negative Dialektik: Fragmente zur Vorlesung 1965/66, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. Main, 2007.
2. Amesbury, R.: Secularity, Religion, and the Spatialization of Time, J. Am. Acad. Relig., in press, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfx047, 2018.
3. Asad, T.: Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA, 2003.
4. Assmann, J.: Politische Theologie zwischen Ägypten und Israel, Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung, München, 1992 (2006).
5. Assmann, J.: Herrschaft und Heil: Politische Theologie in Ägypten, Israel und Europa, Hanser, München, 2000.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献