The global atmospheric budget of ethanol revisited
-
Published:2012-01-11
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:545-555
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Kirstine W. V.,Galbally I. E.
Abstract
Abstract. Ethanol is an important biogenic volatile organic compound, which is increasingly used as a fuel for motor vehicles; therefore, an improved understanding of its atmospheric cycle is important. In this paper we use three sets of observational data, measured emissions of ethanol from living plants, measured concentrations of ethanol in the atmosphere and measured hydroxyl concentrations in the atmosphere (by methyl chloroform titration), to make two independent estimates related to the rate of cycling of ethanol through the atmosphere. In the first estimate, simple calculations give the emission rate of ethanol from living plants as 26 (range, 10–38) Tg yr−1. This contributes significantly to the total global ethanol source of 42 (range, 25–56) Tg yr−1. In the second estimate, the total losses of ethanol from the global atmosphere are 70 (range, 50–90) Tg yr−1, with about three-quarters of the ethanol removed by reaction with hydroxyl radicals in the gaseous and aqueous phases of the atmosphere, and the remainder lost through wet and dry deposition to land. These values of both the source of ethanol from living plants and the removal of atmospheric ethanol via oxidation by hydroxyl radicals (derived entirely from observations) are significantly larger than those in recent literature. We suggest that a revision of the estimate of global ethanol emissions from plants to the atmosphere to a value comparable with this analysis is warranted.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Anderson, J. G.: Ethanol fuel use in Brazil: air quality impacts, Energy Environ. Sci., 2, 1015–1037, 2009. 2. Beale, R., Liss, P. S., and Nightingale, P. D.: First ocean measurements of ethanol and propanol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L24607, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045534, 2010. 3. Boudries, H., Bottenheim, J. W., Guimbaud, C., Grannas, A. M., Shepson, P. B., Houdier, S., Perrier, S., and Dominé, F.: Distribution and trends of oxygenated hydrocarbons in the high Arctic derived from measurements in the atmosphere boundary layer and interstitial snow air during ALERT2000 field campaign, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2573–2583, 2002. 4. Chawanakul, S., Chaiprasert, P., Towprayoon, S., and Tanticharoen, M.: Contributions of available substrates and activities of trophic microbial community to methanogenesis in vegetative and reproductive rice rhizospheric soil, J. Environ. Biol., 30, 119–127, 2009. 5. Chung, M. Y., Beene, M., Ashkan, S., Krauter, C., and Hasson, A. S.: Evaluation of non-enteric sources of non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions from dairies, Atmos. Environ., 44, 786–794, 2010.
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|