Horses for courses: analytical tools to explore planetary boundaries
-
Published:2016-03-21
Issue:1
Volume:7
Page:267-279
-
ISSN:2190-4987
-
Container-title:Earth System Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Dynam.
Author:
van Vuuren Detlef P., Lucas Paul L., Häyhä Tiina, Cornell Sarah E.ORCID, Stafford-Smith Mark
Abstract
Abstract. There is a need for more integrated research on sustainable development and global environmental change. In this paper, we focus on the planetary boundaries framework to provide a systematic categorization of key research questions in relation to avoiding severe global environmental degradation. The four categories of key questions are those that relate to (1) the underlying processes and selection of key indicators for planetary boundaries, (2) understanding the impacts of environmental pressure and connections between different types of impacts, (3) better understanding of different response strategies to avoid further degradation, and (4) the available instruments to implement such strategies. Clearly, different categories of scientific disciplines and associated model types exist that can accommodate answering these questions. We identify the strength and weaknesses of different research areas in relation to the question categories, focusing specifically on different types of models. We discuss that more interdisciplinary research is need to increase our understanding by better linking human drivers and social and biophysical impacts. This requires better collaboration between relevant disciplines (associated with the model types), either by exchanging information or by fully linking or integrating them. As fully integrated models can become too complex, the appropriate type of model (the racehorse) should be applied for answering the target research question (the race course).
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference69 articles.
1. Akimoto, H.: Global Air Quality and Pollution, Science, 302, 1716–1919, 2003. 2. Alkemade, R., Van Oorschot, M., Miles, L., Nellemann, C., Bakkenes, M., and
Ten Brink, B.: GLOBIO3: A Framework to investigate options for reducing
global terrestrial biodiversity loss, Ecosystems, 12, 374–390, 2009. 3. Arnell, N. W. and Lloyd-Hughes, B.: The global-scale impacts of
climate change on water resources and flooding under new climate and
socio-economic scenarios, Climatic Change, 122, 127–140, 2014. 4. Bijl, D. L., Bogaart, P. W., Kram, T., De Vries, B. J. M., and Van Vuuren,
D. P.: Long-term Water Demand for Electricity, Industry Households, 55, 75–86, 2016. 5. Bouwman, L., Goldewijk, K. K., Van der Hoek, K. W., Beusen, A. H. W., Van
Vuurena, D. P., Willems, J., Rufino, M. C., and Stehfest, E.: Exploring
global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by
livestock production over the 1900–2050 period, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,,
110, 20882–20887, 2013.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|