Author:
Müller Andrea B.,Avellán Tamara,Schanze Jochen
Abstract
AbstractOne key challenge of water resources management is the identification and processing of the information necessary for decision-making. This article aims to provide avenues for translating a ‘water scarcity–water reuse’ (WS–WR) situation into an information system. It is dedicated to supporting an integrated assessment in decision-making with the final goal of optimising water scarcity risk reduction and water reuse sustainability. The approach combines the following two strands: (1) specific interpretation of systems thinking and (2) systemic characterisation and interlinkage of indicators. The result is an analytical concept that translates the WS–WR situation into an information system consisting of two structured components, a multi-layer (ML) and a lane-based (LB) approach. While the multi-layer approach supports the description of the elements of the biophysical and information systems such as endpoints and descriptors, respectively, the lane-based approach aids in understanding the importance of indicators within the entire system and their distribution across risk and sustainability realms. The findings from a generic exemplification of the analytical concept depict the feasibility of identifying system-based endpoints representing the WS–WR situation and their translation via descriptors to an interlinked indicator set to jointly assess water scarcity risk and sustainability of the water reuse measures. Therefore, this analytical concept supports addressing the water resources management information challenge via a structured representation of the system’s complexity and the quantification and visualisation of interlinkages between the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of water scarcity risk and water reuse sustainability.
Funder
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Technische Universität Dresden
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference69 articles.
1. Alberti M, Asbjornsen H, Baker LA, et al (2011) Research on Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS): Approach, challenges, and strategies. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
2. Alcamo J et al. (2003) Introduction and conceptual framework. In: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA
3. Basurko OC, Mesbahi E (2014) Methodology for the sustainability assessment of marine technologies. J Clean Prod 68:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.022
4. Bennich T, Maneas G, Maniatakou S et al (2020) Transdisciplinary research for sustainability: scoping for project potential. Int Soc Sci J ISSJ. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12245
5. Binder CR, Hinkel J, Bots PWG, Pahl-Wostl C (2013) Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献