Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration
-
Published:2021-02-09
Issue:2
Volume:14
Page:995-1013
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Buehler Colby, Xiong Fulizi, Zamora Misti Levy, Skog Kate M., Kohrman-Glaser Joseph, Colton Stefan, McNamara Michael, Ryan Kevin, Redlich Carrie, Bartos MatthewORCID, Wong Brandon, Kerkez Branko, Koehler Kirsten, Gentner Drew R.
Abstract
Abstract. The distribution and dynamics of atmospheric pollutants are
spatiotemporally heterogeneous due to variability in emissions, transport,
chemistry, and deposition. To understand these processes at high
spatiotemporal resolution and their implications for air quality and
personal exposure, we present custom, low-cost air quality monitors that
measure concentrations of contaminants relevant to human health and climate,
including gases (e.g., O3, NO, NO2, CO, CO2, CH4, and
SO2) and size-resolved (0.3–10 µm) particulate matter. The
devices transmit sensor data and location via cellular communications and
are capable of providing concentration data down to second-level temporal
resolution. We produce two models: one designed for stationary (or mobile
platform) operation and a wearable, portable model for directly measuring
personal exposure in the breathing zone. To address persistent problems with
sensor drift and environmental sensitivities (e.g., relative humidity and
temperature), we present the first online calibration system designed
specifically for low-cost air quality sensors to calibrate zero and span
concentrations at hourly to weekly intervals. Monitors are tested and
validated in a number of environments across multiple outdoor and indoor
sites in New Haven, CT; Baltimore, MD; and New York City. The evaluated
pollutants (O3, NO2, NO, CO, CO2, and PM2.5) performed
well against reference instrumentation (e.g., r=0.66–0.98) in urban field
evaluations with fast e-folding response times (≤ 1 min), making them
suitable for both large-scale network deployments and smaller-scale targeted
experiments at a wide range of temporal resolutions. We also provide a
discussion of best practices on monitor design, construction, systematic
testing, and deployment.
Funder
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Science Foundation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference35 articles.
1. Alphasense Ltd.: IRC-A1 Carbon Dioxide Infrared Sensor Data Sheet, available at: http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/IRC-A1.pdf (last access: 11 December 2020), 2018. 2. Alphasense Ltd.: CO-A4 Carbon Monoxide Sensor Data Sheet, available at:
http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/CO-A4.pdf (last access: 11 December 2020), 2019a. 3. Alphasense Ltd.: NO-A4 Nitric Oxide Sensor Data Sheet, available at:
http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NO-A4.pdf (last access: 11 December 2020), 2019b. 4. Bigi, A., Mueller, M., Grange, S. K., Ghermandi, G., and Hueglin, C.: Performance of NO, NO2 low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3717–3735, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018, 2018. 5. Borrego, C., Costa, A. M., Ginja, J., Amorim, M., Coutinho, M., Karatzas,
K., Sioumis, T., Katsifarakis, N., Konstantinidis, K., De Vito, S.,
Esposito, E., Smith, P., André, N., Gérard, P., Francis, L. A.,
Castell, N., Schneider, P., Viana, M., Minguillón, M. C., Reimringer,
W., Otjes, R. P., von Sicard, O., Pohle, R., Elen, B., Suriano, D., Pfister,
V., Prato, M., Dipinto, S., and Penza, M.: Assessment of air quality
microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise, Atmos.
Environ., 147, 246–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.050, 2016.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|