Evaluation of the reflectivity calibration of W-band radars based on observations in rain
-
Published:2020-11-03
Issue:11
Volume:13
Page:5799-5825
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Myagkov Alexander, Kneifel StefanORCID, Rose Thomas
Abstract
Abstract. This study presents two methods for evaluating the reflectivity calibration of W-band cloud radars. Both methods use natural rain as a reference target. The first approach is based on a self-consistency method of polarimetric radar variables, which is widely used in the precipitation radar community. As previous studies pointed out, the method cannot be directly applied to higher frequencies where non-Rayleigh scattering effects and attenuation have a nonnegligible influence on radar variables. The method presented here solves this problem by using polarimetric Doppler spectra to separate backscattering and propagational effects. New fits between the separated radar variables allow one to estimate the absolute radar calibration using a minimization technique. The main advantage of the self-consistency method is its lower dependence on the spatial variability in radar drop size distribution (DSD). The estimated uncertainty of the method is ±0.7 dB. The method was applied to three intense precipitation events, and the retrieved reflectivity offsets were within the estimated uncertainty range. The second method is an improvement on the conventional disdrometer-based approach, where reflectivity from the lowest range gate is compared to simulated reflectivity using surface disdrometer observations. The improved method corrects, first, for the time lag between surface DSD observations and the radar measurements at a certain range. In addition, the effect of evaporation of raindrops on their way towards the surface is mitigated. The disdrometer-based method was applied to 12 rain events observed by vertically pointed W-band radar and showed repeatable estimates of the reflectivity offsets at rain rates below 4 mm h−1 within ±0.9 dB. The proposed approaches can analogously be extended to Ka-band radars. Although very different in terms of complexity, both methods extend existing radar calibration evaluation approaches, which are inevitably needed for the growing cloud radar networks in order to provide high-quality radar observation to the atmospheric community.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference99 articles.
1. Acquistapace, C., Kneifel, S., Löhnert, U., Kollias, P., Maahn, M., and Bauer-Pfundstein, M.: Optimizing observations of drizzle onset with millimeter-wavelength radars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1783–1802, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1783-2017, 2017. a 2. Alku, L., Moisseev, D., Aittomäki, T., and Chandrasekar, V.:
Identification and Suppression of Nonmeteorological Echoes Using Spectral
Polarimetric Processing, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
53, 3628–3638, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2380476, 2015. a 3. Angulo-Martínez, M., Beguería, S., Latorre, B., and Fernández-Raga, M.: Comparison of precipitation measurements by OTT Parsivel2 and Thies LPM optical disdrometers, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2811–2837, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2811-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d 4. Atlas, D.: RADAR CALIBRATION, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
83, 1313–1316, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-83.9.1313, 2002. a 5. Aydin, K. and Lure, Y.-M.: Millimeter wave scattering and propagation in
rain – A computational study at 94 and 140 GHz for oblate spheroidal and
spherical raindrops, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 29,
593–601, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.135821, 1991. a, b, c, d
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|