Calibration Transfer Methodology for Cloud Radars Based on Ice Cloud Observations

Author:

Jorquera Susana1ORCID,Toledo Bittner Felipe2,Delanoë Julien1,Berne Alexis3,Billault-Roux Anne-Claire3,Schwarzenboeck Alfons4,Dezitter Fabien5,Viltard Nicolas1,Martini Audrey1

Affiliation:

1. a Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales/UVSQ/CNRS/UPMC, Guyancourt, France

2. b Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Ecole polytechnique-IP Paris, ENS-PSL Université, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Palaiseau, France

3. c Environmental Remote Sensing Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

4. d Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, Aubière, France

5. e Airbus Helicopters, Marignane, France

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a calibration transfer methodology that can be used between radars of the same or different frequency bands. This method enables the absolute calibration of a cloud radar by transferring it from another collocated instrument with known calibration, by simultaneously measuring vertical ice cloud reflectivity profiles. The advantage is that the added uncertainty in the newly calibrated instrument can converge to the magnitude of the reference instrument calibration. This is achieved by carefully selecting comparable data, including the identification of the reflectivity range that avoids the disparities introduced by differences in sensitivity or scattering regime. The result is a correction coefficient used to compensate measurement bias in the uncalibrated instrument. Calibration transfer uncertainty can be reduced by increasing the number of sampling periods. The methodology was applied between collocated W-band radars deployed during the ICE-GENESIS campaign (Switzerland 2020/21). A difference of 2.2 dB was found in their reflectivity measurements, with an uncertainty of 0.7 dB. The calibration transfer was also applied to radars of different frequency, an X-band radar with unknown calibration and a W-band radar with manufacturer calibration; the difference found was −16.7 dB with an uncertainty of 1.2 dB. The method was validated through closure, by transferring calibration between three different radars in two different case studies. For the first case, involving three W-band radars, the bias found was of 0.2 dB. In the second case, involving two W-band and one X-band radar, the bias found was of 0.3 dB. These results imply that the biases introduced by performing the calibration transfer with this method are negligible.

Funder

H2020 Societal Challenges

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Ocean Engineering

Reference47 articles.

1. ACTRIS, 2022: ACTRIS facilities. Accessed 8 February 2023, https://www.actris.eu/facilities.

2. Battaglia, A., S. Tanelli, F. Tridon, S. Kneifel, J. Leinonen, and P. Kollias, 2020: Triple-frequency radar retrievals. Satellite Precipitation Measurement, V. Levizzani et al., Eds., Advances in Global Change Research, Vol. 67, Springer, 211–229.

3. ICE GENESIS: Synergetic aircraft and ground-based remote sensing and in situ measurements of snowfall microphysical properties;Billault-Roux, A.-C.,2023

4. From CloudSat-CALIPSO to EarthCARE: Evolution of the DARDAR cloud classification and its comparison to airborne radar-lidar observations;Ceccaldi, M.,2013

5. Calibration procedures for Global Precipitation-Measurement ground-validation radars;Chandrasekar, V.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3