Forcing the Global Fire Emissions Database burned-area dataset into the Community Land Model version 5.0: impacts on carbon and water fluxes at high latitudes
-
Published:2023-08-22
Issue:16
Volume:16
Page:4699-4713
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Seo Hocheol, Kim YeonjooORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Wildfires influence not only ecosystems but also carbon
and water fluxes on Earth. Yet, the fire processes including the occurrence and consequences of fires are still limitedly represented in land surface models (LSMs). In particular, the performance of LSMs in estimating
burned areas across high northern latitudes is poor. In this study, we
employed the daily burned areas from the satellite-based Global Fire Emissions
Database (version 4) (GFED4) into the Community Land Model (version 5.0) with a
biogeochemistry module (CLM5-BGC) to identify the effects of accurate fire
simulation on carbon and water fluxes over Alaska and Eastern Siberia. The
results showed that the simulated carbon emissions with burned areas from
GFED4 (i.e., experimental run) were significantly improved in comparison to
the default CLM5-BGC simulation, which resulted in opposite signs of the net
ecosystem exchange for 2004, 2005, and 2009 over Alaska between the default
and experimental runs. Also, we identified that carbon emissions were more
sensitive to the wildfires in Alaska than in Eastern Siberia, which could be
explained by the vegetation distribution (i.e., tree cover ratio). In terms
of water fluxes, canopy transpiration in Eastern Siberia was relatively
insensitive to the size of the burned area due to the interaction between leaf
area and soil moisture. This study uses CLM5-BGC to improve our
understanding of the role of burned areas in ecohydrological processes at
high latitudes. Furthermore, we suggest that the improved approach will be
required for better predicting future carbon fluxes and climate change.
Funder
Korea Polar Research Institute National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference51 articles.
1. Andela, N., Morton, D. C., Giglio, L., Paugam, R., Chen, Y., Hantson, S., van der Werf, G. R., and Randerson, J. T.: The Global Fire Atlas of individual fire size, duration, speed and direction, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 529–552, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-529-2019, 2019. 2. Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: Fire as an interactive component of dynamic
vegetation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 110,
G02008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jg000042, 2005. 3. Arora, V. K. and Melton, J. R.: Reduction in global area burned and
wildfire emissions since 1930s enhances carbon uptake by land, Nat. Commun., 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03838-0, 2018. 4. Black, C., Tesfaigzi, Y., Bassein, J. A., and Miller, L. A.: Wildfire smoke
exposure and human health: Significant gaps in research for a growing public
health issue, Environ. Toxicol. Phar., 55, 186–195,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.08.022, 2017. 5. Bowman, D., Balch, J., Artaxo, P., Bond, W., Carlson, J., Cochrane, M.,
Antonio, C., Defries, R., Doyle, J., Harrison, S., Johnston, F., Keeley, J.,
Krawchuk, M., Kull, C., Marston, J., Moritz. M., Prentice,I., Roos, C.,
Scott, A., Swetnam, T., van der Werf, G., and Pyne, S.: Fire in the Earth
System, Science, 324, 481–484, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886,
2009.
|
|