Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP)
-
Published:2013-05-15
Issue:3
Volume:6
Page:617-641
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Wania R., Melton J. R.ORCID, Hodson E. L., Poulter B.ORCID, Ringeval B., Spahni R.ORCID, Bohn T., Avis C. A., Chen G., Eliseev A. V.ORCID, Hopcroft P. O., Riley W. J.ORCID, Subin Z. M., Tian H.ORCID, van Bodegom P. M., Kleinen T.ORCID, Yu Z. C.ORCID, Singarayer J. S., Zürcher S.ORCID, Lettenmaier D. P., Beerling D. J., Denisov S. N.ORCID, Prigent C., Papa F., Kaplan J. O.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The Wetland and Wetland CH4 Intercomparison of Models Project (WETCHIMP) was created to evaluate our present ability to simulate large-scale wetland characteristics and corresponding methane (CH4) emissions. A multi-model comparison is essential to evaluate the key uncertainties in the mechanisms and parameters leading to methane emissions. Ten modelling groups joined WETCHIMP to run eight global and two regional models with a common experimental protocol using the same climate and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) forcing datasets. We reported the main conclusions from the intercomparison effort in a companion paper (Melton et al., 2013). Here we provide technical details for the six experiments, which included an equilibrium, a transient, and an optimized run plus three sensitivity experiments (temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric CO2 concentration). The diversity of approaches used by the models is summarized through a series of conceptual figures, and is used to evaluate the wide range of wetland extent and CH4 fluxes predicted by the models in the equilibrium run. We discuss relationships among the various approaches and patterns in consistencies of these model predictions. Within this group of models, there are three broad classes of methods used to estimate wetland extent: prescribed based on wetland distribution maps, prognostic relationships between hydrological states based on satellite observations, and explicit hydrological mass balances. A larger variety of approaches was used to estimate the net CH4 fluxes from wetland systems. Even though modelling of wetland extent and CH4 emissions has progressed significantly over recent decades, large uncertainties still exist when estimating CH4 emissions: there is little consensus on model structure or complexity due to knowledge gaps, different aims of the models, and the range of temporal and spatial resolutions of the models.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference124 articles.
1. Aselman, I. and Crutzen, P. J.: Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, and their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions, J. Atmos. Chem., 8, 307–358, 1989. 2. Avis, C. A., Weaver, A. J., and Meissner, K. J.: Reduction in areal extent of high-latitude wetlands in response to permafrost thaw, Nat. Geosci., 4, 444–448, 2011. 3. Bartalev, S. A., Belward, A. S., Erchov, D. V., and Isaev, A. S.: A new SPOT4-VEGETATION derived land cover map of Northern Eurasia, Int. J. Remote Sens., 24, 1977–1982, 2003. 4. Batjes, N. H.: A world dataset of derived soil properties by FAO-UNESCO soil unit for global modelling, Soil Use Manage., 13, 9–16, 1997. 5. Beerling, D. J. and Woodward, F. I.: Vegetation and the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle: Modelling the first 400 Million Years, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
Cited by
161 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|