Abstract
Abstract. Suspended sediment load in rivers is highly uncertain because sediment production and transport at catchment scale are strongly variable in space and time, and they are affected by catchment hydrology, topography, and land cover.
Among the main sources of this variability are the spatially distributed nature of overland flow as an erosion driver and of surface erodibility given by soil type and vegetation cover distribution. Temporal variability mainly results from the time sequence of rainfall intensity during storms and snowmelt leading to soil saturation and overland flow. We present a new spatially distributed soil erosion and suspended sediment transport module integrated into the computationally efficient physically based hydrological model TOPKAPI-ETH, with which we investigate the effects of the two erosion drivers – precipitation and surface erodibility – on catchment sediment fluxes in a typical pre-Alpine mesoscale catchment.
By conducting a series of numerical experiments, we quantify the impact of spatial variability in the two key erosion drivers on erosion–deposition patterns, sediment delivery ratio, and catchment sediment yields. Main findings are that the spatial variability in erosion drivers affects sediment yield by (i) increasing sediment production due to a spatially variable precipitation, while decreasing it due to a spatially variable surface erodibility, (ii) favouring the clustering of sediment source areas in space by surface runoff generation, and (iii) decreasing their connectivity to the river network by magnifying sediment buffers.
The results highlight the importance of resolving spatial gradients controlling hydrology and sediment processes when modelling sediment dynamics at the mesoscale, in order to capture the key effects of sediment sources, buffers, and hillslope hydrological pathways in determining the sediment signal.
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Geophysics
Reference88 articles.
1. Asselman, N. E.: Suspended sediment dynamics in a large drainage basin: The
River Rhine, Hydrol. Process., 13, 1437–1450,
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199907)13:10<1437::AID-HYP821>3.0.CO;2-J, 1999. a
2. Asselman, N. E.: Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves,
J. Hydrol., 234, 228–248, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00253-5,
2000. a
3. Battista, G., Molnar, P., and Burlando, P.: Model inputs and simulation results, ETH Zurich Research Collection, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000358874, 2019. a
4. Beasley, D. B., Huggins, L. F., and Monke, E. J.: ANSWERS: A Model for
Watershed Planning, T. ASAE, 23, 0938–0944,
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34692,
1980. a
5. Bennett, G. L., Molnar, P., McArdell, B. W., and Burlando, P.: A probabilistic
sediment cascade model of sediment transfer in the Illgraben, Water
Resour. Res., 50, 1225–1244, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013806, 2014. a
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献