Effect of water vapor on the determination of aerosol direct radiative effect based on the AERONET fluxes
-
Published:2014-06-20
Issue:12
Volume:14
Page:6103-6110
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Huttunen J., Arola A.ORCID, Myhre G.ORCID, Lindfors A. V.ORCID, Mielonen T.ORCID, Mikkonen S.ORCID, Schafer J. S., Tripathi S. N., Wild M.ORCID, Komppula M., Lehtinen K. E. J.
Abstract
Abstract. The aerosol direct radiative effect (ADRE) is defined as the change in the solar radiation flux, F, due to aerosol scattering and absorption. The difficulty in determining ADRE stems mainly from the need to estimate F without aerosols, F0, with either radiative transfer modeling and knowledge of the atmospheric state, or regression analysis of radiation data down to zero aerosol optical depth (AOD), if only F and AOD are observed. This paper examines the regression analysis method by using modeled surface data products provided by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). We extrapolated F0 by two functions: a straight linear line and an exponential nonlinear decay. The exponential decay regression is expected to give a better estimation of ADRE with a few percent larger extrapolated F0 than the linear regression. We found that, contrary to the expectation, in most cases the linear regression gives better results than the nonlinear. In such cases the extrapolated F0 represents an unrealistically low water vapor column (WVC), resulting in underestimation of attenuation caused by the water vapor, and hence too large F0 and overestimation of the magnitude of ADRE. The nonlinear ADRE is generally 40–50% larger in magnitude than the linear ADRE due to the extrapolated F0 difference. Since for a majority of locations, AOD and WVC have a positive correlation, the extrapolated F0 with the nonlinear regression fit represents an unrealistically low WVC, and hence too large F0. The systematic underestimation of F0 with the linear regression is compensated by the positive correlation between AOD and water vapor, providing the better result.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference27 articles.
1. Bokoye, A. I., Royer, A., Cliche, P., and O'Neill, N.: Calibration of Sun Radiometer – based atmospheric water vapor retrievals using GPS meteorology, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 964–979, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2011.1, 2007. 2. Bush, B. C. and Valero, F. P. J.: Spectral aerosol radiative forcing at the surface during the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX), J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000020, 2002. 3. Bush, B. C. and Valero, F. P. J.: Surface aerosol radiative forcing at Gosan during the ACE-Asia campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003233, 2003. 4. Conant, W. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Wang, J., Carmichael, G. R., Tang, Y., Uno, I., Flatau, P. J., Markowicz, K. M., and Quinn, P. K.: A model for the radiative forcing during ACE-Asia derived from CIRPAS Twin Otter and R/V Ronald H. Brown data and comparison with observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8661, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003260, 2003. 5. Derimian, Y., Léon, J.-F., Dubovik, O., Chiapello, I., Tanré, D., Sinyuk, A., Auriol, F., Podvin, T., Brogniez, G., and Holben, B. N.: Radiative properties of aerosol mixture observed during the dry season 2006 over M'Bour, Senegal (African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis campaign), J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00C09, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009904, 2008.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|