High-resolution drought simulations and comparison to soil moisture observations in Germany
-
Published:2022-10-12
Issue:19
Volume:26
Page:5137-5161
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Boeing FriedrichORCID, Rakovec OldrichORCID, Kumar RohiniORCID, Samaniego LuisORCID, Schrön MartinORCID, Hildebrandt AnkeORCID, Rebmann CorinnaORCID, Thober StephanORCID, Müller SebastianORCID, Zacharias SteffenORCID, Bogena HeyeORCID, Schneider Katrin, Kiese RalfORCID, Attinger Sabine, Marx AndreasORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Germany's 2018–2020 consecutive drought events resulted in multiple sectors – including agriculture, forestry, water management, energy
production, and transport – being impacted. High-resolution information systems are key to preparedness for such extreme drought events. This study evaluates the new
setup of the one-kilometer German drought monitor (GDM), which is based on daily soil moisture (SM) simulations from the mesoscale hydrological
model (mHM). The simulated SM is compared against a set of diverse observations from single profile measurements, spatially distributed sensor
networks, cosmic-ray neutron stations, and lysimeters at 40 sites in Germany. Our results show that the agreement of simulated and observed
SM dynamics in the upper soil (0–25 cm) are especially high in the vegetative active period (0.84 median correlation R) and lower in
winter (0.59 median R). The lower agreement in winter results from methodological uncertainties in both simulations and observations. Moderate but
significant improvements between the coarser 4 km resolution setup and the ≈ 1.2 km resolution GDM in the agreement to
observed SM dynamics is observed in autumn (+0.07 median R) and winter (+0.12 median R). Both model setups display similar correlations to
observations in the dry anomaly spectrum, with higher overall agreement of simulations to observations with a larger spatial footprint. The higher
resolution of the second GDM version allows for a more detailed representation of the spatial variability of SM, which is particularly beneficial
for local risk assessments. Furthermore, the results underline that nationwide drought information systems depend both on appropriate simulations of
the water cycle and a broad, high-quality, observational soil moisture database.
Funder
Helmholtz Association
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference89 articles.
1. Albergel, C., De Rosnay, P., Balsamo, G., Isaksen, L., and Muñoz-Sabater, J.:
Soil moisture analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation using global ground-based in situ observations, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 1442–1460, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0107.1, 2012. a 2. Andreasen, M., Jensen, K. H., Desilets, D., Franz, T. E., Zreda, M., Bogena, H. R., and Looms, M. C.:
Status and Perspectives on the Cosmic-Ray Neutron Method for Soil Moisture Estimation and Other Environmental Science Applications, Vadose Zone J., 16, vzj2017.04.0086, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.04.0086, 2017. a, b 3. Baatz, R., Bogena, H. R., Hendricks Franssen, H., Huisman, J. A., Montzka, C., and Vereecken, H.:
An empirical vegetation correction for soil water content quantification using cosmic ray probes, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2030–2046, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016443, 2015. a 4. Baatz, R., Hendricks Franssen, H.-J., Han, X., Hoar, T., Bogena, H. R., and Vereecken, H.:
Evaluation of a cosmic-ray neutron sensor network for improved land surface model prediction, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2509–2530, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2509-2017, 2017. a 5. Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D., Running, S., Anthoni, P., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K., Evans, R., Fuentes, J., Goldstein, A., Katul, G., Law, B., Lee, X., Malhi, Y., Meyers, T., Munger, W., Oechel, W., U, K. T. P., Pilegaard, K., Schmid, H. P., Valentini, R., Verma, S., Vesala, T., Wilson, K., and Wofsy, S.:
FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 2415–2434, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2, 2001. a
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|