Impact of 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns on particulate air pollution across Europe
-
Published:2023-09-11
Issue:17
Volume:23
Page:10145-10161
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Putaud Jean-Philippe, Pisoni Enrico, Mangold AlexanderORCID, Hueglin ChristophORCID, Sciare Jean, Pikridas MichaelORCID, Savvides Chrysanthos, Ondracek Jakub, Mbengue SaliouORCID, Wiedensohler AlfredORCID, Weinhold Kay, Merkel Maik, Poulain LaurentORCID, van Pinxteren Dominik, Herrmann HartmutORCID, Massling Andreas, Nordstroem Claus, Alastuey AndrésORCID, Reche Cristina, Pérez Noemí, Castillo Sonia, Sorribas MarORCID, Adame Jose Antonio, Petaja TuukkaORCID, Lehtipalo KatrianneORCID, Niemi Jarkko, Riffault VéroniqueORCID, de Brito Joel F.ORCID, Colette AugustinORCID, Favez Olivier, Petit Jean-EudesORCID, Gros Valérie, Gini Maria I., Vratolis Stergios, Eleftheriadis KonstantinosORCID, Diapouli EvangeliaORCID, Denier van der Gon HugoORCID, Yttri Karl EspenORCID, Aas WencheORCID
Abstract
Abstract. To fight against the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) in 2020, lockdown measures were implemented in most European
countries. These lockdowns had well-documented effects on human mobility. We
assessed the impact of the lockdown implementation and relaxation on air
pollution by comparing daily particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide
(NO2) and ozone (O3) concentrations, as well as particle number
size distributions (PNSDs) and particle light absorption coefficient in situ
measurement data, with values that would have been expected if no COVID-19 epidemic had occurred
at 28 sites across Europe for the period 17 February–31 May 2020.
Expected PM, NO2 and O3 concentrations were calculated from the
2020 Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) ensemble forecasts,
combined with 2019 CAMS ensemble forecasts and measurement data. On average,
lockdown implementations did not lead to a decrease in PM2.5 mass
concentrations at urban sites, while relaxations resulted in a +26 ± 21 % rebound. The impacts of lockdown implementation and relaxation on
NO2 concentrations were more consistent (−29 ± 17 and +31 ± 30 %, respectively). The implementation of the lockdown measures
also induced statistically significant increases in O3 concentrations
at half of all sites (+13 % on average). An enhanced oxidising capacity
of the atmosphere could have boosted the production of secondary aerosol at
those places. By comparison with 2017–2019 measurement data, a
significant change in the relative contributions of wood and fossil fuel
burning to the concentration of black carbon during the lockdown was
detected at 7 out of 14 sites. The contribution of particles smaller than 70 nm to the total number of particles significantly also changed at most of
the urban sites, with a mean decrease of −7 ± 5 % coinciding with
the lockdown implementation. Our study shows that the response of PM2.5
and PM10 mass concentrations to lockdown measures was not systematic at
various sites across Europe for multiple reasons, the relationship between
road traffic intensity and particulate air pollution being more complex than
expected.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Altuwayjiri, A., Soleimanian, E., Moroni, S., Palomba, P., Borgini, A., De
Marco, C., Ruprecht, A. A., and Sioutas, C.: The impact of stay-home policies
during Coronavirus-19 pandemic on the chemical and toxicological
characteristics of ambient PM2.5 in the metropolitan area of Milan, Italy,
Sci. Total Environ., 758, 143582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143582,
2021. 2. Archer, C. L., Cervone, G., Golbazi, M., Al Fahel, N., and Hultquist, C.: Changes
in air quality and human mobility in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic,
B. Atmos. Sci. Technol., 1, 491–514,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42865-020-00019-0, 2020. 3. Barré, J., Petetin, H., Colette, A., Guevara, M., Peuch, V.-H., Rouil, L., Engelen, R., Inness, A., Flemming, J., Pérez García-Pando, C., Bowdalo, D., Meleux, F., Geels, C., Christensen, J. H., Gauss, M., Benedictow, A., Tsyro, S., Friese, E., Struzewska, J., Kaminski, J. W., Douros, J., Timmermans, R., Robertson, L., Adani, M., Jorba, O., Joly, M., and Kouznetsov, R.: Estimating lockdown-induced European NO2 changes using satellite and surface observations and air quality models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7373–7394, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7373-2021, 2021. 4. Bekbulat, B., Apte, J. S., Millet, D. B., Robinson, A. L., Wells, K. C.,
Presto, A. A., and Marshall, J. D.: Changes in criteria air pollution levels
in the US before, during, and after Covid-19 stay-at-home orders: Evidence
from regulatory monitors, Sci. Total Environ., 769, 144693,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144693, 2021. 5. Beloconi, A., Probst-Hensch, N. M., and Vounatsou, P.: Spatio-temporal
modelling of changes in air pollution exposure associated to the COVID-19
lockdown measures across Europe, Sci. Total Environ., 787, 147607,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147607, 2021.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|