Abstract
Abstract. Kelvin–Helmholtz instability (KHI) is most likely to be the
primary source for clear-air turbulence, which is of importance in pollution
transfer and diffusion and aircraft safety. It is indicated by the critical
value of the dimensionless Richardson (Ri) number, which is predicted to be
1/4 from linear stability analysis. However, Ri is fairly sensitive to the
vertical resolution of the dataset; a higher resolution systematically leads
to a finer structure. The study aims to evaluate the performance of ERA5
reanalysis in determining the spatial–temporal variabilities in subcritical
Ri by comparing it against a near-global high-resolution radiosonde dataset
during the years 2017 to 2022 and further highlights the global climatology and
dynamical environment of subcritical Ri. Overall, the occurrence frequency of
Ri<1/4 is inevitably underestimated by the ERA5 reanalysis over all
climate zones at all heights from the near-ground atmosphere up to 30 km,
compared to radiosonde, due directly to the severe underestimation in wind
shears. Otherwise, the occurrence frequency of Ri<1 in ERA5 is
climatologically consistent with that from Ri<1/4 in radiosondes in
the free troposphere, especially over the midlatitude and subtropics in the
Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere. Therefore, we argue that the threshold value of
Ri could be approximated as 1 rather than 1/4 when using ERA5-based Ri as a
proxy for KHI. The occurrence frequency of subcritical Ri revealed by both
datasets exhibits significant seasonal cycles over all climate zones. In
addition, it is positively correlated with the standard derivation of
orography at low levels and is exceptionally strong over the Niño-3
region at heights of 6–13 km. Furthermore, a high occurrence of subcritical
Ri would likely be accompanied by strong wind speeds and intensive orographic
or non-orographic gravity waves.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
Huazhong Agricultural University
Reference45 articles.
1. Alexander, M. J.: Interpretations of observed climatological patterns in stratospheric gravity wave variance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 8627–8640, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03325, 1998.
2. Duruisseau, F., Huret, N., Andral, A., and Camy-Peyret, C.: Assessment of the ERA-Interim winds using high-altitude stratospheric balloons, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2065–2080, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0137.1, 2017.
3. ECMWF: ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts [data set], https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5, last access: 7 December 2022.
4. Fritts, D. C. and Rastogi, P. K.: Convective and dynamical instabilities due to gravity wave motions in the lower and middle atmosphere: Theory and observations, Radio Sci., 20, 1247–1277, https://doi.org/10.1029/RS020i006p01247, 1985.
5. Fritts, D. C., Franke, P. M., Wan, K., Lund, T., and Werne, J.: Computation of clear-air radar backscatter from numerical simulations of turbulence: 2. Backscatter moments throughout the lifecycle of a Kelvin Helmholtz instability, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D11105, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014618, 2011.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献