Effects of vertical grid spacing on the climate simulated in the ICON-Sapphire global storm-resolving model
-
Published:2024-02-22
Issue:4
Volume:17
Page:1563-1584
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Schmidt HaukeORCID, Rast Sebastian, Bao JiaweiORCID, Cassim Amrit, Fang Shih-WeiORCID, Jimenez-de la Cuesta Diego, Keil PaulORCID, Kluft LukasORCID, Kroll ClarissaORCID, Lang TheresaORCID, Niemeier UlrikeORCID, Schneidereit Andrea, Williams Andrew I. L., Stevens BjornORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Global storm-resolving models (GSRMs) use strongly refined horizontal grids compared with the climate models typically used in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) but employ comparable vertical grid spacings. Here, we study how changes in the vertical grid spacing and adjustments to the integration time step affect the basic climate quantities simulated by the ICON-Sapphire atmospheric GSRM. Simulations are performed over a 45 d period for five different vertical grids with between 55 and 540 vertical layers and maximum tropospheric vertical grid spacings of between 800 and 50 m, respectively. The effects of changes in the vertical grid spacing are compared with the effects of reducing the horizontal grid spacing from 5 to 2.5 km. For most of the quantities considered, halving the vertical grid spacing has a smaller effect than halving the horizontal grid spacing, but it is not negligible. Each halving of the vertical grid spacing, along with the necessary reductions in time step length, increases cloud liquid water by about 7 %, compared with an approximate 16 % decrease for halving the horizontal grid spacing. The effect is due to both the vertical grid refinement and the time step reduction. There is no tendency toward convergence in the range of grid spacings tested here. The cloud ice amount also increases with a refinement in the vertical grid, but it is hardly affected by the time step length and does show a tendency to converge. While the effect on shortwave radiation is globally dominated by the altered reflection due to the change in the cloud liquid water content, the effect on longwave radiation is more difficult to interpret because changes in the cloud ice concentration and cloud fraction are anticorrelated in some regions. The simulations show that using a maximum tropospheric vertical grid spacing larger than 400 m would increase the truncation error strongly. Computing time investments in a further vertical grid refinement can affect the truncation errors of GSRMs similarly to comparable investments in horizontal refinement, because halving the vertical grid spacing is generally cheaper than halving the horizontal grid spacing. However, convergence of boundary layer cloud properties cannot be expected, even for the smallest maximum tropospheric grid spacing of 50 m used in this study.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference44 articles.
1. Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: Description and sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905, 2011. a 2. Beljaars, A., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Bozzo, A., Forbes, R., Hogan, R. J., Köhler, M., Morcrette, J.-J., Tompkins, A. M., Viterbo, P., and Wedi, N.: The numerics of physical parametrization in the ECMWF model, Frontiers in Earth Science, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00137, 2018. a 3. Bogenschutz, P. A., Yamaguchi, T., and Lee, H.-H.: The Energy Exascale Earth System Model simulations With high vertical resolution in the lower troposphere, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002239, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002239, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h 4. Bogenschutz, P. A., Lee, H.-H., Tang, Q., and Yamaguchi, T.: Combining regional mesh refinement with vertically enhanced physics to target marine stratocumulus biases as demonstrated in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 335–352, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-335-2023, 2023. a 5. Brandt, P., Windmiller, J., Begler, C., Brockmann, I., dos Anjos, F. A. A., Engelmann, R., Franke, H., Hans, A.-C., Imbol Koungue, R. A., Kamm, D., Körner, M., Lehmke, J., Maia Pacheco, M., Martens, W., Menzel, D., Olbricht, H. D., Quaglia, I., Roch, M., Rubio, H., Ruhtz, T., Schütte, F., Skupin, A., Stolla, M. K., Tuchen, F. P., and Wittlinger, X. A.: Tropical Atlantic Circulation and Climate: Mooring Rescue, Tech. Rep., Emden, Germany, https://doi.org/10.48433/cr_so284, 2021. a
|
|