Steering operational synergies in terrestrial observation networks: opportunity for advancing Earth system dynamics modelling
-
Published:2018-05-23
Issue:2
Volume:9
Page:593-609
-
ISSN:2190-4987
-
Container-title:Earth System Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Dynam.
Author:
Baatz Roland, Sullivan Pamela L.ORCID, Li LiORCID, Weintraub Samantha R.ORCID, Loescher Henry W., Mirtl Michael, Groffman Peter M.ORCID, Wall Diana H.ORCID, Young MichaelORCID, White Tim, Wen Hang, Zacharias SteffenORCID, Kühn IngolfORCID, Tang JianwuORCID, Gaillardet JérômeORCID, Braud IsabelleORCID, Flores Alejandro N.ORCID, Kumar PraveenORCID, Lin Henry, Ghezzehei TeamratORCID, Jones Julia, Gholz Henry L., Vereecken Harry, Van Looy Kris
Abstract
Abstract. Advancing our understanding of Earth system dynamics (ESD) depends on the
development of models and other analytical tools that apply physical,
biological, and chemical data. This ambition to increase understanding and
develop models of ESD based on site observations was the stimulus for
creating the networks of Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER), Critical Zone
Observatories (CZOs), and others. We organized a survey, the results of which
identified pressing gaps in data availability from these networks, in
particular for the future development and evaluation of models that represent
ESD processes, and provide insights for improvement in both data collection
and model integration. From this survey overview of data applications in the context of LTER and
CZO research, we identified three challenges: (1) widen application of
terrestrial observation network data in Earth system modelling,
(2) develop integrated Earth system models that incorporate process
representation and data of multiple disciplines, and (3) identify
complementarity in measured variables and spatial extent, and promoting
synergies in the existing observational networks. These challenges lead to
perspectives and recommendations for an improved dialogue between the
observation networks and the ESD modelling community, including co-location
of sites in the existing networks and further formalizing these
recommendations among these communities. Developing these synergies will
enable cross-site and cross-network comparison and synthesis studies, which
will help produce insights around organizing principles, classifications,
and general rules of coupling processes with environmental conditions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference76 articles.
1. Archer, S., Schimel, D. S., and Holland, E. A.: Mechanisms of Shrubland
Expansion – Land-Use, Climate or CO2, Climatic Change, 29, 91–99, 1995. 2. Aronova, E., Baker, K. S., and Oreskes, N.: Big Science and Big Data in
Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International
Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network,
1957–Present, Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci., 40, 183–224, 2010. 3. Banwart, S., Menon, M., Bernasconi, S. M., Bloem, J., Blum, W. E. H.,
Souza, D. M., Davidsdotir, B., Duffy, C., Lair, G. J., Kram, P.,
Lamacova, A., Lundin, L., Nikolaidis, N. P., Novak, M., Panagos, P.,
Ragnarsdottir, K. V., Reynolds, B., Robinson, D., Rousseva, S.,
de Ruiter, P., van Gaans, P., Weng, L. P., White, T., and Zhang, B.: Soil
processes and functions across an international network of Critical Zone
Observatories: Introduction to experimental methods and initial results, C.R.
Geosci., 344, 758–772, 2012. 4. Bao, C., Li, L., Shi, Y. N., and Duffy, C.: Understanding watershed
hydrogeochemistry: 1. Development of RT-Flux-PIHM, Water Resour. Res., 53, 2328–2345, 2017. 5. Basu, N. B., Rao, P. S. C., Winzeler, H. E., Kumar, S., Owens, P., and
Merwade, V.: Parsimonious modelling of hydrologic responses in engineered
watersheds: Structural heterogeneity vs. functional homogeneity, Water
Resour. Res., 46, W04501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007803, 2010.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|