Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957––Present

Author:

Aronova Elena1,Baker Karen S.2,Oreskes Naomi3

Affiliation:

1. Department of History, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0104, earonova@ucsd.edu.

2. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Universityof California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0218, kbaker@ucsd.edu.

3. Provost-Sixth College, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive # 0054, La Jolla, CA 92093-0054, naoreskes@ucsd.edu.

Abstract

This paper discusses the historical connections between two large-scale undertakings that became exemplars for worldwide data-driven scientific initiatives after World War II: the International Geophysical Year (1957––1958) and the International Biological Program (1964––1974). The International Biological Program was seen by its planners as a means to promote Big Science in ecology. As the term Big Science gained currency in the 1960s, the Manhattan Project and the national space program became paradigmatic examples, but the International Geophysical Year provided scientists with an alternative model: a synoptic collection of observational data on a global scale. This new, potentially complementary model of Big Science encompassed the field practices of ecologists and suggested a model for the natural historical sciences to achieve the stature and reach of the experimental physical sciences. However, the program encountered difficulties when the institutional structures, research methodologies, and data management implied by the Big Science mode of research collided with the epistemic goals, practices, and assumptions of many ecologists. By 1974, when the program ended, many participants viewed it as a failure. However, this failed program transformed into the Long-Term Ecological Research program. Historical analysis suggests that many of the original incentives of the program (the emphasis on Big Data and the implementation of the organizational structure of Big Science in biological projects) were in fact realized by the program's visionaries and its immediate investigators. While the program failed to follow the exact model of the International Geophysical Year, it ultimately succeeded in providing a renewed legitimacy for synoptic data collection in biology. It also helped to create a new mode of contemporary science of the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER Network), used by ecologists today.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science

Cited by 175 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A framework for optimising opportunistic collaborative syntheses to propel ecological conservation;Biological Conservation;2024-10

2. Reimagining Earth in the Earth System;Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems;2024-08

3. Dos lagos temperados às águas amazônicas;Revista Brasileira de História da Ciência;2024-07-22

4. Big data in Earth science: Emerging practice and promise;Science;2024-03-15

5. “Memory Effects” and Dark Histories;Environmental Humanities;2024-03-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3