Geothermal heat flux from measured temperature profiles in deep ice boreholes in Antarctica
-
Published:2020-11-14
Issue:11
Volume:14
Page:4021-4037
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Talalay PavelORCID, Li Yazhou, Augustin Laurent, Clow Gary D.ORCID, Hong Jialin, Lefebvre Eric, Markov Alexey, Motoyama HideakiORCID, Ritz Catherine
Abstract
Abstract. The temperature at the Antarctic Ice Sheet bed and the
temperature gradient in subglacial rocks have been directly measured only a
few times, although extensive thermodynamic modeling has been used to
estimate the geothermal heat flux (GHF) under the ice sheet. During the last
5 decades, deep ice-core drilling projects at six sites – Byrd, WAIS
Divide, Dome C, Kohnen, Dome F, and Vostok – have succeeded in reaching or nearly reaching the bed at inland locations in Antarctica. When temperature
profiles in these boreholes and steady-state heat flow modeling are combined
with estimates of vertical velocity, the heat flow at the ice-sheet base is
translated to a geothermal heat flux of 57.9 ± 6.4 mW m−2 at Dome
C, 78.9 ± 5.0 mW m−2 at Dome F, and 86.9 ± 16.6 mW m−2
at Kohnen, all higher than the predicted values at these sites. This warm
base under the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) could be caused by radiogenic
heat effects or hydrothermal circulation not accounted for by the models.
The GHF at the base of the ice sheet at Vostok has a negative value of
−3.6 ± 5.3 mW m−2, indicating that water from Lake Vostok is
freezing onto the ice-sheet base. Correlation analyses between modeled and
measured depth–age scales at the EAIS sites indicate that all of them can be
adequately approximated by a steady-state model. Horizontal velocities and
their variation over ice-age cycles are much greater for the West Antarctic
Ice Sheet than for the interior EAIS sites; a steady-state model cannot
precisely describe the temperature distribution here. Even if the
correlation factors for the best fitting age–depth curve are only moderate
for the West Antarctic sites, the GHF values estimated here of 88.4 ± 7.6 mW m−2 at Byrd and 113.3 ± 16.9 mW m−2 at WAIS Divide can be
used as references before more precise estimates are made on the subject.
Funder
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference102 articles.
1. Ackert, R. P., David, J. B., Harold, W. B., Parker, E. C., Mark, D. K., James, L. F., and Eric, J.: Measurements of past ice sheet elevations in interior West Antarctica, Science, 286, 276–280,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5438.276, 1999. 2. Ackert, R. P., Mukhopadhyay, S., Parizek, B. R., and Borns, H. W.: Ice elevation near the West Antarctic Ice Sheet divide during the Last
Glaciation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L21506, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031412,
2007. 3. Ahn, J. and Brook E. J.: Atmospheric CO2 and Climate on Millennial Time Scales During the Last Glacial Period, Science, 322, 83–85, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160832, 2008. 4. Anderson, J. B., Shipp, S. S., Lowe, A. L., Wellner, J. S., and Mosola, A. B.:
The Antarctic Ice Sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum and its subsequent
retreat history: a review, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21, 49–70,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00083-X, 2002. 5. An, M., Wiens, D. A., Zhao, Y., Feng, M., Nyblade, A., Kanao, M., Li, Y., Maggi, A., and Lévêque, J.-J.: Temperature,
lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, and heat flux beneath the Antarctic
Plate inferred from seismic velocities, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 8720–8742, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB011917, 2015.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|