Impacts of physical parameterization on prediction of ethane concentrations for oil and gas emissions in WRF-Chem
-
Published:2018-11-29
Issue:23
Volume:18
Page:16863-16883
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Abdi-Oskouei MaryamORCID, Pfister GabrieleORCID, Flocke Frank, Sobhani Negin, Saide PabloORCID, Fried Alan, Richter Dirk, Weibring PetterORCID, Walega James, Carmichael Gregory
Abstract
Abstract. Recent increases in natural gas (NG) production through hydraulic
fracturing have called the climate benefit of switching from
coal-fired to natural gas-fired power plants into question. Higher than expected levels of
methane, non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and NOx have been
observed in areas close to oil and NG operation facilities. Large
uncertainties in the oil and NG operation emission inventories reduce the
confidence level in the impact assessment of such activities on regional air
quality and climate, as well as in the development of effective mitigation policies.
In this work, we used ethane as the indicator of oil and NG emissions and
explored the sensitivity of ethane to different physical parameterizations and
simulation setups in the Weather Research and Forecasting with
Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model using the US EPA National Emission
Inventory (NEI-2011). We evaluated the impact of the following configurations
and parameterizations on predicted ethane concentrations: planetary boundary
layer (PBL) parameterizations, daily re-initialization of meteorological
variables, meteorological initial and boundary conditions, and horizontal
resolution. We assessed the uncertainties around oil and NG emissions
using measurements from the FRAPPÉ and DISCOVER-AQ campaigns over the
northern Front Range metropolitan area (NFRMA) in summer 2014. The
sensitivity analysis shows up to 57.3 % variability in the normalized mean bias
of the near-surface modeled ethane across the simulations, which highlights
the important role of model configurations on the model performance and
ultimately the assessment of emissions. Comparison between airborne
measurements and the sensitivity simulations indicates that the
model–measurement bias of ethane ranged from −14.9 to −8.2 ppb (NMB
ranged from −80.5 % to −44 %) in regions close to oil and NG
activities. Underprediction of ethane concentration in all sensitivity runs
suggests an actual underestimation of the oil and NG emissions in the
NEI-2011. An increase of oil and NG emissions in the simulations partially
improved the model performance in capturing ethane and lumped alkanes (HC3)
concentrations but did not impact the model performance in capturing benzene,
toluene, and xylene; this is due to very low emission rates of the latter species
from the oil and NG sector in NEI-2011.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference68 articles.
1. Ahmadov, R., McKeen, S., Trainer, M., Banta, R., Brewer, A., Brown, S., Edwards,
P. M., De Gouw, J. A., Frost, G. J., Gilman, J., Helmig, D., Johnson, B., Karion,
A., Koss, A., Langford, A., Lerner, B., Olson, J., Oltmans, S., Peischl, J.,
Pétron, G., Pichugina, Y., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson, T., Schnell, R., Senff,
C., Sweeney, C., Thompson, C., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Wild, R., Williams,
E. J., Yuan, B., and Zamora, R.: Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution
events in an oil- and natural gas-producing region of the western US, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 411–429, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-411-2015, 2015. 2. Allen, D. T.: Emissions from oil and gas operations in the United States and
their air quality implications, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 66, 549–575,
https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1171263, 2016. 3. Alvarez, R. A., Pacala, S. W., Winebrake, J. J., Chameides, W. L., and Hamburg,
S. P.: Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 6435–6440, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202407109, 2012. 4. Angevine, W. M., Eddington, L., Durkee, K., Fairall, C., Bianco, L., and Brioude,
J.: Meteorological model evaluation for CalNex 2010, Mon. Weather Rev., 140,
3885–3906, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00042.1, 2012. 5. Arakawa, A., Jung, J. H., and Wu, C. M.: Toward unification of the multiscale
modeling of the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3731–3742, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3731-2011, 2011.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|