Extrapolating regional probability of drying of headwater streams using discrete observations and gauging networks
-
Published:2018-05-24
Issue:5
Volume:22
Page:3033-3051
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Beaufort AurélienORCID, Lamouroux Nicolas, Pella Hervé, Datry Thibault, Sauquet EricORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Headwater streams represent a substantial proportion of river systems and many of them have intermittent flows due to their upstream position in the network. These intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams have recently seen a marked increase in interest, especially to assess the impact of drying on aquatic ecosystems. The objective of this paper is to quantify how discrete (in space and time) field observations of flow intermittence help to extrapolate over time the daily probability of drying (defined at the regional scale). Two empirical models based on linear or logistic regressions have been developed to predict the daily probability of intermittence at the regional scale across France. Explanatory variables were derived from available daily discharge and groundwater-level data of a dense gauging/piezometer network, and models were calibrated using discrete series of field observations of flow intermittence. The robustness of the models was tested using an independent, dense regional dataset of intermittence observations and observations of the year 2017 excluded from the calibration. The resulting models were used to extrapolate the daily regional probability of drying in France: (i) over the period 2011–2017 to identify the regions most affected by flow intermittence; (ii) over the period 1989–2017, using a reduced input dataset, to analyse temporal variability of flow intermittence at the national level. The two empirical regression models performed equally well between 2011 and 2017. The accuracy of predictions depended on the number of continuous gauging/piezometer stations and intermittence observations available to calibrate the regressions. Regions with the highest performance were located in sedimentary plains, where the monitoring network was dense and where the regional probability of drying was the highest. Conversely, the worst performances were obtained in mountainous regions. Finally, temporal projections (1989–2016) suggested the highest probabilities of intermittence (> 35 %) in 1989–1991, 2003 and 2005. A high density of intermittence observations improved the information provided by gauging stations and piezometers to extrapolate the temporal variability of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference66 articles.
1. Acuña, V., Datry, T., Marshall, J., Barceló, D., Dahm, C. N., Ginebreda, A., McGregor, G., Sabater, S., Tockner, K., and Palmer, M. A.: Why should we care about temporary waterways?, Science, 343, 1080–1081, 2014. 2. Acuña, V., Hunter, M., and Ruhí, A.: Managing temporary streams and rivers as unique rather than second-class ecosystems, Biol. Conserv., 211, 12–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.025, 2017. 3. AFB (French Agency for Biodiversity): Observatoire National des Etiages (ONDE), available at: https://onde.eaufrance.fr (last access: 23 May 2018), 2012–2018. 4. Benda, L., Hassan, M. A., Church, M., and May, C. L.: Geomorphology Of Steepland Headwaters: The Transition From Hillslopes To Channels1, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 41, 835–851, 2005. 5. Benstead, J. P. and Leigh, D. S.: An expanded role for river networks, Nat. Geosci., 5, 678–679, 2012.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|