Development of soil moisture profiles through coupled microwave–thermal infrared observations in the southeastern United States
-
Published:2018-09-25
Issue:9
Volume:22
Page:4935-4957
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Mishra Vikalp, Cruise James F., Hain Christopher R., Mecikalski John R., Anderson Martha C.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The principle of maximum entropy (POME) can be used to develop
vertical soil moisture (SM) profiles. The minimal inputs required by the POME
model make it an excellent choice for remote sensing applications. Two of the
major input requirements of the POME model are the surface boundary condition
and profile-mean moisture content. Microwave-based SM estimates from the Advanced
Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) can supply the surface boundary
condition whereas thermal infrared-based moisture estimated from the
Atmospheric Land EXchange Inverse (ALEXI) surface energy balance model can
provide the mean moisture condition. A disaggregation approach was followed
to downscale coarse-resolution (∼25 km) microwave SM estimates to match
the finer resolution (∼5 km) thermal data. The study was conducted over
multiple years (2006–2010) in the southeastern US. Disaggregated soil
moisture estimates along with the developed profiles were compared with the
Noah land surface model (LSM), as well as in situ measurements from 10
Natural Resource Conservation Services (NRCS) Soil Climate Analysis Network
(SCAN) sites spatially distributed within the study region. The overall
disaggregation results at the SCAN sites indicated that in most cases
disaggregation improved the temporal correlations with unbiased root mean
square differences (ubRMSD) in the range of 0.01–0.09 m3 m−3. The
profile results at SCAN sites showed a mean bias of 0.03 and 0.05
(m3 m−3); ubRMSD of 0.05 and 0.06 (m3 m−3); and correlation
coefficient of 0.44 and 0.48 against SCAN observations and Noah LSM,
respectively. Correlations were generally highest in agricultural areas where
values in the 0.6–0.7 range were achieved.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference98 articles.
1. Aghakouchak, A., Farahmand, A., Melton, F. S., Teixeira, J., Anderson, M. C.,
Wardlow, B. D., and Hain, C. R.: Remote sensing of drought: Progress,
challenges and opportunities, Rev. Geophys., 53, 452–480,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000456, 2015. a 2. Alfieri, J. G., Anderson, M. C., Kustas, W. P., and Cammalleri, C.: Effect of
the revisit interval and temporal upscaling methods on the accuracy of
remotely sensed evapotranspiration estimates, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21,
83–98, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-83-2017, 2017. a 3. Al-Hamdan, O. Z. and Cruise, J. F.: Soil Moisture Profile Development from
Surface Observations by Principle of Maximum Entropy, J. Hydrol.
Eng., 15, 327–337, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000196, 2010. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i 4. Anderson, M. C., Norman, J. M., Diak, G. R., and Kustas, W. P.: A Two-Source
Time-Integrated Model for Estimating Surface Fluxes Using Thermal Infrared
Remote Sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 60, 195–216,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00215-5, 1997. a, b 5. Anderson, M. C., Norman, J. M., Mecikalski, J. R., Otkin, J. A., and Kustas,
W. P.: A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress
across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 2.
Surface moisture climatology, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D10117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007507,
2007. a, b
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|