A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0)
-
Published:2023-01-27
Issue:2
Volume:16
Page:659-677
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Ireson Andrew M.ORCID, Spiteri Raymond J., Clark Martyn P., Mathias Simon A.
Abstract
Abstract. A simple numerical solution procedure – namely the method of lines combined with an off-the-shelf ordinary differential equation (ODE) solver – was shown in previous work to
provide efficient, mass-conservative solutions to the pressure-head form of Richards' equation. We implement such a solution in our model openRE. We
developed a novel method to quantify the boundary fluxes that reduce water balance errors without negative impacts on model runtimes – the
solver flux output method (SFOM). We compare this solution with alternatives, including the classic modified Picard iteration method and
the Hydrus 1D model. We reproduce a set of benchmark solutions with all models. We find that Celia's solution has the best water balance, but it can
incur significant truncation errors in the simulated boundary fluxes, depending on the time steps used. Our solution has comparable runtimes to
Hydrus and better water balance performance (though both models have excellent water balance closure for all the problems we considered). Our
solution can be implemented in an interpreted language, such as MATLAB or Python, making use of off-the-shelf ODE solvers. We evaluated alternative
SciPy ODE solvers that are available in Python and make practical recommendations about the best way to implement them for Richards' equation. There
are two advantages of our approach: (i) the code is concise, making it ideal for teaching purposes; and (ii) the method can be easily extended to
represent alternative properties (e.g., novel ways to parameterize the K(ψ) relationship) and processes (e.g., it is straightforward to
couple heat or solute transport), making it ideal for testing alternative hypotheses.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference30 articles.
1. Bear, J. and Cheng, A. H. D.:
Modeling groundwater flow and contaminant transport, Vol. 23, in: Theory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media, Springer, Dordrecht, 834, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6682-5, 2010. 2. Beven, K., and Germann, P.:
Macropores and water flow in soils revisited, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3071–3092, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20156, 2013. 3. Brown, P. N., Hindmarsh, A. C., and Byrne, G. D.:
VODE. Variable Coefficient ODE Solver, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp., 10, 1038–1051, https://doi.org/10.1137/0910062, 1989. 4. Celia, M. A., Bouloutas, E. T., and Zarba, R. L.:
A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation, Water Resour. Res., 26, 1483–1496, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i007p01483, 1990. 5. Clark, M. P., Fan, Y., Lawrence, D. M., Adam, J. C., Bolster, D., Gochis, D. J., Hooper, R. P., Kumar, M., Leung, L. R., Mackay, D. S., and Maxwell, R. M.:
Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5929–5956, 2015.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|