Arctic freshwater fluxes: sources, tracer budgets and inconsistencies
-
Published:2019-08-14
Issue:8
Volume:13
Page:2111-2131
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Forryan Alexander, Bacon SheldonORCID, Tsubouchi TakamasaORCID, Torres-Valdés SinhuéORCID, Naveira Garabato Alberto C.
Abstract
Abstract. The net rate of freshwater input to the Arctic Ocean has been calculated in the past by two methods: directly, as the sum of precipitation, evaporation and runoff, an approach hindered by sparsity of measurements, and by the ice and ocean budget method, where the net surface freshwater flux within a defined boundary is calculated from the rate of dilution of salinity, comparing ocean inflows with ice and ocean outflows. Here a third method is introduced, the geochemical method, as a modification of the budget method. A standard approach uses geochemical tracers (salinity, oxygen isotopes, inorganic nutrients) to compute “source fractions” that quantify a water parcel's constituent proportions of seawater, freshwater of meteoric origin, and either sea ice melt or brine (from the freezing-out of sea ice). The geochemical method combines the source fractions with the boundary velocity field of the budget method to quantify the net flux derived from each source. Here it is shown that the geochemical method generates an Arctic Ocean surface freshwater flux, which is also the meteoric source flux, of 200±44 mSv (1 Sv=106 m3 s−1), statistically indistinguishable from the budget method's 187±44 mSv, so that two different approaches to surface freshwater flux calculation are reconciled. The freshwater export rate of sea ice (40±14 mSv) is similar to the brine export flux, due to the “freshwater deficit” left by the freezing-out of sea ice (60±50 mSv). Inorganic nutrients are used to define Atlantic and Pacific seawater categories, and the results show significant non-conservation, whereby Atlantic seawater is effectively “converted” into Pacific seawater. This is hypothesized to be a consequence of denitrification within the Arctic Ocean, a process likely becoming more important with seasonal sea ice retreat. While inorganic nutrients may now be delivering ambiguous results on seawater origins, they may prove useful to quantify the Arctic Ocean's net denitrification rate. End point degeneracy is also discussed: multiple property definitions that lie along the same “mixing line” generate confused results.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference65 articles.
1. Aagaard, K. and Carmack, E. C.: The role of sea ice and other fresh water in
the Arctic circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 94, 14485–14498, 1989. a, b 2. Abrahamsen, E. P., Meredith, M. P., Falkner, K. K., Torres-Valdes, S., Leng,
M. J., Alkire, M. B., Bacon, S., Laxon, S. W., Polyakov, I., and Ivanov, V.:
Tracer-derived freshwater composition of the Siberian continental shelf and
slope following the extreme Arctic summer of 2007, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 36, L07602, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037341, 2009. a 3. Aksenov, Y., Bacon, S., Coward, A. C., and Holliday, N. P.: Polar outflow from
the Arctic Ocean: A high resolution model study, J. Marine
Syst., 83, 14–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.06.007, 2010. a 4. Aleksandrov, Y. I., Bryazgin, N. N., Førland, E. J., Radionov, V. F., and
Svyashchennikov, P. N.: Seasonal, interannual and long-term variability of
precipitation and snow depth in the region of the Barents and Kara seas,
Polar Res., 24, 69–85, https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v24i1.6254, 2005. a 5. Alkire, M. B., Morison, J., and Andersen, R.: Variability in the meteoric
water, sea-ice melt, and Pacific water contributions to the central
Arctic Ocean, 2000-2014, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120,
1573–1598, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010023, 2015. a
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|