Carbon cycle uncertainty in the Alaskan Arctic
-
Published:2014-08-14
Issue:15
Volume:11
Page:4271-4288
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Fisher J. B., Sikka M., Oechel W. C.ORCID, Huntzinger D. N., Melton J. R.ORCID, Koven C. D., Ahlström A., Arain M. A., Baker I., Chen J. M.ORCID, Ciais P., Davidson C., Dietze M., El-Masri B., Hayes D., Huntingford C., Jain A. K.ORCID, Levy P. E.ORCID, Lomas M. R., Poulter B.ORCID, Price D., Sahoo A. K., Schaefer K., Tian H.ORCID, Tomelleri E., Verbeeck H.ORCID, Viovy N.ORCID, Wania R., Zeng N.ORCID, Miller C. E.
Abstract
Abstract. Climate change is leading to a disproportionately large warming in the high northern latitudes, but the magnitude and sign of the future carbon balance of the Arctic are highly uncertain. Using 40 terrestrial biosphere models for the Alaskan Arctic from four recent model intercomparison projects – NACP (North American Carbon Program) site and regional syntheses, TRENDY (Trends in net land atmosphere carbon exchanges), and WETCHIMP (Wetland and Wetland CH4 Inter-comparison of Models Project) – we provide a baseline of terrestrial carbon cycle uncertainty, defined as the multi-model standard deviation (σ) for each quantity that follows. Mean annual absolute uncertainty was largest for soil carbon (14.0 ± 9.2 kg C m−2), then gross primary production (GPP) (0.22 ± 0.50 kg C m−2 yr−1), ecosystem respiration (Re) (0.23 ± 0.38 kg C m−2 yr−1), net primary production (NPP) (0.14 ± 0.33 kg C m−2 yr−1), autotrophic respiration (Ra) (0.09 ± 0.20 kg C m−2 yr−1), heterotrophic respiration (Rh) (0.14 ± 0.20 kg C m−2 yr−1), net ecosystem exchange (NEE) (−0.01 ± 0.19 kg C m−2 yr−1), and CH4 flux (2.52 ± 4.02 g CH4 m−2 yr−1). There were no consistent spatial patterns in the larger Alaskan Arctic and boreal regional carbon stocks and fluxes, with some models showing NEE for Alaska as a strong carbon sink, others as a strong carbon source, while still others as carbon neutral. Finally, AmeriFlux data are used at two sites in the Alaskan Arctic to evaluate the regional patterns; observed seasonal NEE was captured within multi-model uncertainty. This assessment of carbon cycle uncertainties may be used as a baseline for the improvement of experimental and modeling activities, as well as a reference for future trajectories in carbon cycling with climate change in the Alaskan Arctic and larger boreal region.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference98 articles.
1. Agarwal, D. A., Humphrey, M., Beekwilder, N. F., Jackson, K. R., Goode, M. M., and van Ingen, C.: A data-centered collaboration portal to support global carbon-flux analysis, Concurr. Computat., 22, 2323–2334, 2010. 2. Arain, M. A., Yuan, F., and Andrew Black, T.: Soil–plant nitrogen cycling modulated carbon exchanges in a western temperate conifer forest in Canada, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 140, 171–192, 2006. 3. Baker, I. T., Prihodko, L., Denning, A. S., Goulden, M., Miller, S., and da Rocha, H. R.: Seasonal drought stress in the Amazon: Reconciling models and observations, J. Geophys. Res., 113, G00B01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jg000644 2008. 4. Baldocchi, D.: "Breathing" of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems, Austr. J. Botany, 56, 1–26, 2008. 5. Belshe, E. F., Schuur, E. A. G., Bolker, B. M., and Bracho, R.: Incorporating spatial heterogeneity created by permafrost thaw into a landscape carbon estimate, J. Geophys. Res., 117, G01026, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001836, 2012.
Cited by
99 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|