Analysis of lightning outliers in the EUCLID network
-
Published:2017-11-27
Issue:11
Volume:10
Page:4561-4572
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Poelman Dieter R.,Schulz Wolfgang,Kaltenboeck Rudolf,Delobbe Laurent
Abstract
Abstract. Lightning data as observed by the European Cooperation for Lightning Detection (EUCLID) network are used in combination with radar data to retrieve the temporal and spatial behavior of lightning outliers, i.e., discharges located in a wrong place, over a 5-year period from 2011 to 2016. Cloud-to-ground (CG) stroke and intracloud (IC) pulse data are superimposed on corresponding 5 min radar precipitation fields in two topographically different areas, Belgium and Austria, in order to extract lightning outliers based on the distance between each lightning event and the nearest precipitation. It is shown that the percentage of outliers is sensitive to changes in the network and to the location algorithm itself. The total percentage of outliers for both regions varies over the years between 0.8 and 1.7 % for a distance to the nearest precipitation of 2 km, with an average of approximately 1.2 % in Belgium and Austria. Outside the European summer thunderstorm season, the percentage of outliers tends to increase somewhat. The majority of all the outliers are low peak current events with absolute values falling between 0 and 10 kA. More specifically, positive cloud-to-ground strokes are more likely to be classified as outliers compared to all other types of discharges. Furthermore, it turns out that the number of sensors participating in locating a lightning discharge is different for outliers versus correctly located events, with outliers having the lowest amount of sensors participating. In addition, it is shown that in most cases the semi-major axis (SMA) assigned to a lightning discharge as a confidence indicator in the location accuracy (LA) is smaller for correctly located events compared to the semi-major axis of outliers.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Azadifar, M., Rachidi, F., Rubinstein, M., Paolone, M., Diendorfer, G., Pichler, H., Schulz, W., Pavanello, D., and Romero, C.: Evaluation of the performance characteristics of the European Lightning Detection Network EUCLID in the Alps region for upward negative flashes using direct measurements at the instrumented Säntis Tower, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 595–606, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024259, 2016. 2. Biagi, C. J., Cummins, K. L., Kehoe, K. E., and Krider, E. P.: National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) performance in southern Arizona, Texas, and Oklahoma in 2003–2004, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D05208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007341, 2007. 3. Cramer, J. A. and Cummins, K. L.: Evaluating location accuracy of lightning location networks using tall towers, in: 23rd International Lightning Detection Conference & 5th International Lightning Meteorology Conference, Vaisala Inc., Tucson, Arizona, 2014. 4. Cooray, V., Fernando, M., Sörensen, T., Götschl, T., and Pedersen, A.: Propagation of lightning generated transient electromagnetic fields over fintely conducting ground, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 62, 583–600, 2000. 5. Cummins, K., Murphy, M., Bardo, E., Hiscox, R., Pyle, W. L., and Pifer, A.: A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 9035–9044, 1998.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|